
Of course, if only they would actually enact policy at shows based off of these wishes, but again, another thread.
Originally posted by olli66:hoserama, thanks for the heads up on your mix where the singer goes nuts on the cellphone folk(s).
sounds like fun
my comment regarding the demand of live shows was based on the band/management checking forums and dime/jungleland. how could they know how many dvddubbingguy blu-rays are out there?
I am off this thread now. I will never sell my U2 recordings and those are my last words on the matter of "ethics" because we wanted to keep this thread polite and don't go down likea(nasty)song.
Originally posted by hoserama:My two cents--selling and such is a bit more grey than I'd like it to be. Everybody has a price. If I had opportunity to pay a chunk of change for something super rare that I wouldn't be able to get other wise (let's say a stash of Lovetown soundboards), would I take it? Yes. But I generally don't approve of selling/buying.
I strongly disapprove of selling a product. This is a hobby, and it's a slippery slope of selling bootlegs as a product. Once you sell a product, it's not about the time or effort that you put into it anymore--you're just salesman.
I do draw the distinction, like Chrisedge, of making an arrangement prior to the show. Then you're basically paying for the service. So if somebody buys my ticket and covers my basic expenses (parking, batteries, etc.) I don't have a problem with it. Let's say that comes out to $200. I would take that offer to tape a show, if I was interested. But if you came to me after the fact and tried to buy the recording from me for $200, I'd easily say no. Again, product vs service. If you're paying for the service, you also share the risk of things failing.
I will never sell the mixes I produce. I do those mixes for my own fun and enjoyment. Some of them I release, some of them I don't. So drawing the distinction between service vs product--if somebody paid me XYZ amount of money to mix a show, I wouldn't necessarily have an ethical issue of that. Again, doing a service. Yet I would not want that show sold as a product. And of course--if you actually paid me hourly for a good U2 mix, it wouldn't be affordable for most folks.
So in many ways, I don't think I'm disagreeing with Olli completely. I'm not fundamentally opposed to some level of compensation for time. I think it sets our hobby on a very dark path if we start flipping products for cash, and I strongly disagree with that.
Again, some may disagree with my distinctions here. I'm not saying it works for everyone. I do know that in the taper community for most folks I know, once you've been identified as somebody that sells recordings, your name is burned. Pretty sure I know at least one of the folks that Olli66 is talking about for Springsteen recordings, and their name got burned because they were identified as selling their recordings to a bootleg company. Karma bit, because the market dried up completely once Springsteen started releasing soundboards. At one point, many moons ago, I was offered $1000 by a bootleg cfor a Rolling Stones 2002 ALD recording from a bootleg company. Tempting for a 16 year old hoserama, but turned it down. Anyways, bit of a tangent there.
There's my 2 cents.
Originally posted by blueeyedboy:Just my random blah, blah, blah...I've bought my share of boots in the 80's and 90's when they were more tangible. Like now, some were much better quality than others but you had the packaging at least if you bought a bust. (you couldn't listen first back then) Interestingly (see Paul quote above) most of the best were from Italy! I'd still be inclined to buy them if they were packaged and pressed like they were. Anyway... Sorry. Thats just my midweek two-cents, psychobabble
Originally posted by JulienLossless:[..]
but this topic is not about buying bootlegs (i have more than 200 silver cd from different artists) but about providing sources for them, or being yourself the bootlegger selling recordings. there will always be a market for those anyway, and there are still some copyright holes allowing some bootlegs to be sold out in the open, yet it remains something that is mostly run by various mafias.
Originally posted by olli66:hoserama, thanks for the heads up on your mix where the singer goes nuts on the cellphone folk(s).
sounds like fun
my comment regarding the demand of live shows was based on the band/management checking forums and dime/jungleland. how could they know how many dvddubbingguy blu-rays are out there?
I am off this thread now. I will never sell my U2 recordings and those are my last words on the matter of "ethics" because we wanted to keep this thread polite and don't go down likea(nasty)song.
Originally posted by hoserama:[..]
Strange, I really didn't get a nasty vibe in this thread. I like to think we can have an honest fair discussion. Olli66--we've spoken about this in the past. While I know we don't agree on the issue, we can still be civil and agree to disagree.