Originally posted by LikeASong[..]This is the typical example of the fact that there is a big difference between lossy and lossless.
Originally posted by germcevoyyou can tell form mp3 which boots really need to be had in lossless. I tried to find 1993-05 10 - Rotterdam in lossless but couldn't find it. I think this boot would be a lot better in lossless
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Indeed. Also 1985-03-21 Chicago, 1990-01-10 Rotterdam and a few more would be greatly improved if lossless.
Originally posted by germcevoyits just finding the bleedin things. I hate searching U2torrents. terrible layout
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Yesssssssssss
Originally posted by germcevoyfound it. Theres 2 versions though one has far better comments left for it by users. 800MB though. Do you manage lossless downloads Sergio?
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Of course. Just leave me a link and I will have it in 3 hours.
Originally posted by germcevoyI can download it fine. I just have a question. I know that i'll need software to play the lossless files on my computer but can I just burn the file to a CD to listen to on my hifi without this software?
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]I don't know. When I get lossless files, I always convert them to MP3.
Originally posted by germcevoydoes that not defy the purpose of having lossless?
Anyway, I used to listen once to the lossless files. Originally posted by germcevoycheers for the link. I'll keep that for later. What I want to do is this ;
1) Download lossless show
2) Burn show to disc as lossless so I can put it on my hi-fi
3) If I can hear an improvement in quality through my earphones i'm going to burn it to itunes using
apples own lossless format so I can have lossless on my ipod.