Originally posted by germcevoyWhat i'm trying to say is that the shows didn't set themselves apart from any others on the tour just because they were in Dublin. Average shows in Dublin are mean't to be stunning. Just wasn't like that on the Vertigo tour I don't feel
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Ooh yes. i can't help agreeing.
Originally posted by germcevoythere was a hell of a lot of hype here in Ireland before the Croke shows. Commercially the hype was justified but I don't think the shows delivered. My uncle who was a t all 3 and is a die hard fan also agreed. He didnt say they were bad (and niether do I), but just not too special. Not as special as one would expect from U2's first shows on home turf in 4 years
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]That's the point. Not too special.
Originally posted by germcevoybut still great. The beauty of U2
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]i really don't think U2 still great. They play good, they look good, but the magic.. has disappeared a bit. I went to my first and only concert under the Vertigo Tour sign, and they were the best 10 hours of my life. But I'm realistic: i would have enjoyed much more a Joshua Show than a Vertigo one.
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
that also goes without saying. We'l never witness Exit or The Unforgettable Fire or that voice, that energy or ZooTV. Ah well though. I'll be happy seein the boys wenever I do