1. Originally posted by djrlewis[..]







    I wasn't referring to anything untoward good fellow *cheesy Pommy stereotype again* - I merely suggested that you weren't being entirely serious, and that if you were, you weren't in a fit state of mind lol.
  2. Well I'm off for tonight as well pervs...I mean friends. Been a pleasure (don't read into that) chatting with you all as usual!
  3. Originally posted by djrlewis[..]








    we need a "shame on you" smiley, one that does a "wag of the finger", like as in shame on you. (I have a bad feeling this one gets turned dirty)
  4. Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2Well I'm off for tonight as well pervs...I mean friends. Been a pleasure (don't read into that) chatting with you all as usual!


    Only they would dude! See ya!
  5. Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2Well I'm off for tonight as well pervs...I mean friends. Been a pleasure (don't read into that) chatting with you all as usual!

    On that innuendo-strewn farewell, auf wiedersehen Nicole!



    PS - Steve, I reckon you should just forget that idea lol.
  6. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]


    PS - Steve, I reckon you should just forget that idea lol.


    i knew that wouldnt last two seconds.... at least it lasted longer than retrobuff's topics.

    the funny bit:

    Controversy
    The episode has caused controversy in the United Kingdom for use of the word "wanker". The word is first used by Adam Clayton and later by Mr. Burns at the end of the episode. While the word is not well known in the United States, the word is considered offensive in the UK. On April 15, 2008, "Trash of the Titans" was broadcast on Channel 4 at 6pm, with both mentions of the word broadcast. Ofcom, which deals with television complaints in the UK, received 31 complaints, who felt that the episode should not have been shown before the 9pm watershed. Channel 4 said that the error was caused by a member of the compliance staff, who had incorrectly certified the programme as suitable to be shown from 6pm. The error was not corrected by the acquisitions department. Ofcom said that while they were "concerned", it would not look into the incident any further because it was "an isolated incident".[13][14] The episode had earlier been shown on BBC2, who owned the UK broadcasting rights to The Simpsons before Channel 4, with the two incidences of the word "wanker" edited out on at least one of the occasions they broadcast it.[15]
  7. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    I wasn't referring to anything untoward good fellow *cheesy Pommy stereotype again* - I merely suggested that you weren't being entirely serious, and that if you were, you weren't in a fit state of mind lol.


    Me?

    Serious?

    I sincerely hope not.
  8. Originally posted by djrlewis[..]

    Me?

    Serious?

    I sincerely hope not.

    Good grief, no good sir. We thrive on a lack of seriousness, do we not? Or do we? There's profundity if I ever saw it...
  9. Hello folks! Anything new in town?
  10. hi mates back again ,wat were you talking about?
  11. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Good grief, no good sir. We thrive on a lack of seriousness, do we not? Or do we? There's profundity if I ever saw it...


    Hence and henceforth. Thus and thusly, your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the matrix. You are the eventuality of an anomaly, which despite my sincerest efforts I have been unable to eliminate from what is otherwise a harmony of mathematical precision. While it remains a burden to sedulously avoid it, it is not unexpected, and thus not beyond a measure of control. Which has led you, inexorably, here. I have since come to understand that the answer eluded me because it required a lesser mind, or perhaps a mind less bound by the parameters of perfection.
  12. Originally posted by kisho8hi mates back again ,wat were you talking about?


    They ignore us Kareem..

    How are you mate?