Originally posted by JohnnyVOXXwell
I'm off!!
see ya all tomorrow!!
cheers and take care!!
Originally posted by djrlewisI see the Chat topic has morphed into the Tech topic!!
I remember my first computer had a 48k processor (Spectrum). My last PC before the Mac mini had a 850Mb processor and a 20Gb hard drive. It was massive when I got it (2000).
Nice Vista screens. I will never use it. Very happy with my Mac OS (still on Tiger, no need for me that I can see to go to Leopard)
How's everyone today?
Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]
The old Spectrum. That's showing age.
It has morphed into the Tech Topic. My last computer before this current one (3.08GHz Intel, 512MB RAM, 80GB drive + 300GB external drive and ugly-as-arse blue case) was very similar but with a 1GHz Pentium 3 Intel processor and 20GB drive. Leopard is nice looking but from the experiences I've heard it's nothing better than the earliest MacOS - Tiger's the way to stay if you're enjoying it and it works. I remember Bill Gates saying once nobody needs more than 640K memory. Now it's 2.6GB RAM.
Currently on my PC Vista struggles particularly through Media Center, but MCE2005 is fine (just some last problems with HDTV signals), plus I'm seriously thinking about the Mac (dual-boot with MCE2005 purely for multimedia) or even Linux Ubuntu (beautifully simple and it looks nice).
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
Oi!!
Yes, very happy with Tiger and only swayed by the pretty bits of Leopard + Time Machine. So will leave it as inevitably I will upgrade the laptop in the next couple years anyway (not having a SuperDrive is killing me).
I'm very happy with the mac as you knwo and if you run Parallels then jobs a good 'un.
Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]
Prety bits always sway me. Seriously, Parallels is a great program. I think Nate might run it too (easports) because he was telling me he uses his Mac for gaming in Vista. Or he just runs Boot Camp.
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
Yeah, I remember Nate saying he ran Windows too for games. Parallels makes a bit more sense I guess 'cos then you don't need to re-boot. But Boot Camp is free......
Mac excel at pretty bits, they've always swayed me. Just can't justify the £125 for a family-licence at present, especially given it will be on there if I buy new at some stage.
Originally posted by easports43[..]
I use boot camp. It's worth re-booting, considering parallels doesn't perform as well as boot camp. Plus, as you said, it's free.
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
Have you got Leopard then or did you download the Beta of Boot Camp?
PS Hi by the way![]()