1. Originally posted by Hans23[..]

    its very similar to the Sydney 1993 gig, they thought that would be their last because of adams late night




    i heard about this.....dont recall the story tho. where can i find it?
  2. Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    I rather have a nice dose of Gone, Kite and Out of Control. Thats just me though.

    Probably not just you lol, I can't think what I'd prefer yet though - I'm in a bit of a War phase at the moment ....
    Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    although you gotta admit U2 were closer to their fans on the Elevation Tour...

    this is kinda Indoor Intimacy against Outdoor Rocking as far as types of shows come. It depends on what you prefer. However, when Elevation was brought outside....there was this one show that highlighted the tour.......

    Ah, y'see, I prefer Outdoor Rocking Songs like WTSHNN, WOWY and WGRYWH really come alive in the big arenas just as much as the slower more intimate stuff. I also think that it was representative of how the band felt at the time. Coming off the back of Pop, where they felt they'd let people down in some respects (hence Bono's quote of "re-applying for best band in the world"), they felt they really need to regain the trust of the fans, whereas during Vertigo, they were on a high and Bono was on a roll as far as his own personal work was going, so they felt pretty good about themselves
    Originally posted by stj0691I like to think of it as Slane against Buenos Aires as far as best of's come......

    I'd take Slane anyday

    That's not really fair lol, considering Slane was one of the best shows the band have ever done, yet wasn't necessarily a good representation of the tour as a whole (in my opinion). On the other hand, Buenos Aires was Vertigo at its best in many ways, which (in my opinion) happened fairly frequently. Check the Milan show and Sao Paulo as (what I'd consider to be) other good examples
  3. Originally posted by Hans23[..]

    its very similar to the Sydney 1993 gig, they thought that would be their last because of adams late night




    Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    i heard about this.....dont recall the story tho. where can i find it?

    I think I remember reading it on the Wikipedia entry for the Sydney DVD...might be wrong though.
  4. Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    i heard about this.....dont recall the story tho. where can i find it?


    i think someone said it on the forums, decribing the way With or Without you was song with special emotion and bono had directed it towards Adam, beleiving it was the last gig they were going to play. Hard to remember what thread though.
  5. "Years later in a Rolling Stone interview, Bono discussed this performance and its significance to the band. Clayton’s absence the previous night had caused a real situation amongst the band members and they were all wondering what long term impact the event would have. Bono said he wasn’t sure that they would ever play live again – he realized during the show that it could be the band's last live performance. As a result, the band's performance that night is particularly emotional, especially during "With or Without You," "Love Is Blindness" and "Can't Help Falling in Love.""

    found it on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoo_TV:_Live_from_Sydney

    EDIT:
    Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    [..]
    I think I remember reading it on the Wikipedia entry for the Sydney DVD...might be wrong though.


    you got there before me
  6. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Probably not just you lol, I can't think what I'd prefer yet though - I'm in a bit of a War phase at the moment ....
    [..]
    Ah, y'see, I prefer Outdoor Rocking Songs like WTSHNN, WOWY and WGRYWH really come alive in the big arenas just as much as the slower more intimate stuff. I also think that it was representative of how the band felt at the time. Coming off the back of Pop, where they felt they'd let people down in some respects (hence Bono's quote of "re-applying for best band in the world"), they felt they really need to regain the trust of the fans, whereas during Vertigo, they were on a high and Bono was on a roll as far as his own personal work was going, so they felt pretty good about themselves
    [..]
    That's not really fair lol, considering Slane was one of the best shows the band have ever done, yet wasn't necessarily a good representation of the tour as a whole (in my opinion). On the other hand, Buenos Aires was Vertigo at its best in many ways, which (in my opinion) happened fairly frequently. Check the Milan show and Sao Paulo as (what I'd consider to be) other good examples


    preferences change one's thoughts about a show in a big way.

    I've always liked indoor shows, and the feeling they bring. reminds me of the Who's 1971 tour in a lot of ways. the only boot you can hear this tho is 1971-11-29.

    you're right with the Slane thing.... however Elevation was a two part tour, just as PopMart and Zoo TV are divided as well. Elevation has the 1st and 2nd Leg shows where it was getting back their status and best band in the world. The 3rd leg was so intimate and carried so much meaning to the band and audience, the shows became almost a dream like state
  7. Originally posted by Hans23"Years later in a Rolling Stone interview, Bono discussed this performance and its significance to the band. Clayton’s absence the previous night had caused a real situation amongst the band members and they were all wondering what long term impact the event would have. Bono said he wasn’t sure that they would ever play live again – he realized during the show that it could be the band's last live performance. As a result, the band's performance that night is particularly emotional, especially during "With or Without You," "Love Is Blindness" and "Can't Help Falling in Love.""

    found it on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoo_TV:_Live_from_Sydney

    EDIT:
    [..]

    you got there before me


    gives me a new reason to watch Sydney now
  8. Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    preferences change one's thoughts about a show in a big way.

    I've always liked indoor shows, and the feeling they bring. reminds me of the Who's 1971 tour in a lot of ways. the only boot you can hear this tho is 1971-11-29.

    you're right with the Slane thing.... however Elevation was a two part tour, just as PopMart and Zoo TV are divided as well. Elevation has the 1st and 2nd Leg shows where it was getting back their status and best band in the world. The 3rd leg was so intimate and carried so much meaning to the band and audience the shows because almost a dream state

    Indeed. Thing is, I like both tours, so it's the best of both worlds

    What I mean though, is that shows like Buenos Aires etc. were representative of what was good about the Vertigo tour whereas Slane was what was good about U2, if you get me - Slane was U2 through and through, whereas Buenos Aires was a depiction of U2 in one of their many guises over the years, it wasn't so much about the legs or what have you (although having manic South Americans like Johnny in the crowd didn't harm matters )...
    Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    gives me a new reason to watch Sydney now

    I didn't think one needed a reason to watch Sydney, it's just fantastic
  9. Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    gives me a new reason to watch Sydney now


    you can't have enough reasons to watch Zoo TV. Tuesday night ofter my Karoke set seems a good time to sit and watch it alone in the house
  10. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Indeed. Thing is, I like both tours, so it's the best of both worlds

    What I mean though, is that shows like Buenos Aires etc. were representative of what was good about the Vertigo tour whereas Slane was what was good about U2, if you get me - Slane was U2 through and through, whereas Buenos Aires was a depiction of U2 in one of their many guises over the years, it wasn't so much about the legs or what have you (although having manic South Americans like Johnny in the crowd didn't harm matters )...
    [..]
    I didn't think one needed a reason to watch Sydney, it's just fantastic


    right....

    shows like the Boston shows from the 1st leg and MSG shows from the 3rd leg would be my reps.
  11. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    [..]
    I didn't think one needed a reason to watch Sydney, it's just fantastic


    never really had the chance to sit down and really get to watch it
  12. Originally posted by Hans23[..]

    you can't have enough reasons to watch Zoo TV. Tuesday night ofter my Karoke set seems a good time to sit and watch it alone in the house


    lucky......there's always someone else home when I'm home