General chat topic

Originally posted by stj0691[..]

i heard about this.....dont recall the story tho. where can i find it?

Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

[..]
I think I remember reading it on the Wikipedia entry for the Sydney DVD...might be wrong though.

Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Probably not just you lol, I can't think what I'd prefer yet though - I'm in a bit of a War phase at the moment ....
[..]
Ah, y'see, I prefer Outdoor Rocking Songs like WTSHNN, WOWY and WGRYWH really come alive in the big arenas just as much as the slower more intimate stuff. I also think that it was representative of how the band felt at the time. Coming off the back of Pop, where they felt they'd let people down in some respects (hence Bono's quote of "re-applying for best band in the world"), they felt they really need to regain the trust of the fans, whereas during Vertigo, they were on a high and Bono was on a roll as far as his own personal work was going, so they felt pretty good about themselves
[..]
That's not really fair lol, considering Slane was one of the best shows the band have ever done, yet wasn't necessarily a good representation of the tour as a whole (in my opinion). On the other hand, Buenos Aires was Vertigo at its best in many ways, which (in my opinion) happened fairly frequently. Check the Milan show and Sao Paulo as (what I'd consider to be) other good examples

Originally posted by Hans23"Years later in a Rolling Stone interview, Bono discussed this performance and its significance to the band. Clayton’s absence the previous night had caused a real situation amongst the band members and they were all wondering what long term impact the event would have. Bono said he wasn’t sure that they would ever play live again – he realized during the show that it could be the band's last live performance. As a result, the band's performance that night is particularly emotional, especially during "With or Without You," "Love Is Blindness" and "Can't Help Falling in Love.""

found it on wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoo_TV:_Live_from_Sydney

EDIT:
[..]

you got there before me

Originally posted by stj0691[..]

preferences change one's thoughts about a show in a big way.

I've always liked indoor shows, and the feeling they bring. reminds me of the Who's 1971 tour in a lot of ways. the only boot you can hear this tho is 1971-11-29.

you're right with the Slane thing.... however Elevation was a two part tour, just as PopMart and Zoo TV are divided as well. Elevation has the 1st and 2nd Leg shows where it was getting back their status and best band in the world. The 3rd leg was so intimate and carried so much meaning to the band and audience the shows because almost a dream state

Originally posted by stj0691[..]

gives me a new reason to watch Sydney now

Originally posted by stj0691[..]

gives me a new reason to watch Sydney now

Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Indeed. Thing is, I like both tours, so it's the best of both worlds

What I mean though, is that shows like Buenos Aires etc. were representative of what was good about the Vertigo tour whereas Slane was what was good about U2, if you get me - Slane was U2 through and through, whereas Buenos Aires was a depiction of U2 in one of their many guises over the years, it wasn't so much about the legs or what have you (although having manic South Americans like Johnny in the crowd didn't harm matters )...
[..]
I didn't think one needed a reason to watch Sydney, it's just fantastic

Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

[..]
I didn't think one needed a reason to watch Sydney, it's just fantastic

Originally posted by Hans23[..]

you can't have enough reasons to watch Zoo TV. Tuesday night ofter my Karoke set seems a good time to sit and watch it alone in the house

Originally posted by stj0691[..]

right....

shows like the Boston shows from the 1st leg and MSG shows from the 3rd leg would be my reps.

Originally posted by stj0691[..]

never really had the chance to sit down and really get to watch it

Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Indeed. Thing is, I like both tours, so it's the best of both worlds

What I mean though, is that shows like Buenos Aires etc. were representative of what was good about the Vertigo tour whereas Slane was what was good about U2, if you get me - Slane was U2 through and through, whereas Buenos Aires was a depiction of U2 in one of their many guises over the years, it wasn't so much about the legs or what have you (although having manic South Americans like Johnny in the crowd didn't harm matters )...

Originally posted by Hans23[..]

I think the diffeance between the vertigo legs were large, Especially the Amercian legs and the Rest of the world legs, They were miles apart, diffeant venues, sizes and crowds. Vertigo seemd more suited for the large scale than arenas