Originally posted by MWSAHI just wondered: why did U2 sell a compilation of Kite as a B-side to Window in the Skies, while the version of Melbourne 11-18 is perfect enough?
Umm...I really don't GET what you're saying casper

Originally posted by MWSAHI just wondered: why did U2 sell a compilation of Kite as a B-side to Window in the Skies, while the version of Melbourne 11-18 is perfect enough?
Originally posted by Ali709[..]
Umm...I really don't GET what you're saying casper![]()
Originally posted by Ali709Umm...I really don't GET what you're saying casper![]()
Originally posted by Ali709Thanks for the explanation Drew and Sergio...didn't know that!
Things look good on this side of the world...it's been snowing since early morning in Tehran! We've got around 25-30 cm of snow right now, which is beautiful and fun!![]()
Originally posted by JohnnyVOXXhello!!!
Happy New Year to you all!!!
anyone online????
how is your day doing???
here at B.A. terrible weather, Temp is around 40°, we are literally sufocating!!! someone please turn off the oven!!! haha!!! and forecast says tonight's going to be worse......
Originally posted by LikeASongAli, the version of Kite that U2 released as the bside of WITSkise single was NT single rendition of the song, was actually a mix of some shows (Melbourne and Sydney I think), as a "compilaion" of Kites. He says that, 'why not releasing the 18th ovember version,which is fantastic on its own?'.
Originally posted by drewhigginsThe guy who is Officially Nominated to be the future Technology Administrator of the site [/b]]Well, it's simple....perfection and getting it right - which sometimes, like Chicago DVD doesn't quite work.
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]I know, always there are mistakes (except on the ZOO TV Sydney DVD, where I couldn't find any mistake - it's perfect), but for the people who were at the shows it must be some kind of piss-off to know that "your" version wasn't good enough...
BTW thanks for that "knows everything has to do w/ bootlegs"
Originally posted by Ali709Zoo TV Sydney is so cool...I mean, it's from one night only which makes it so consistent (have to thank Adam for that huge hangover) and then it's also perfect, no probs with it!
But...Chicago: 2 nights, Slane: 2 nights...
Originally posted by LikeASongI know, always there are mistakes (except on the ZOO TV Sydney DVD, where I couldn't find any mistake - it's perfect), but for the people who were at the shows it must be some kind of piss-off to know that "your" version wasn't good enough...
BTW thanks for that "knows everything has to do w/ bootlegs"