1. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    HA! (at the first comment); I tried to do it a while ago and it vanished within 2 minutes lol, so I don't know whether someone didn't think I should be allowed to or whether I forgot to press "save my details" lol...


    Haha, probably the latter.
  2. Originally posted by haytrain[..]

    Haha, probably the latter.


    Well, here's to trying it now...
  3. Originally posted by germcevoyDublin 93 upgraded to 192kbps. 128 is just pure shit. Links updated on the bootleg page. You should be able to here a slight improvement

    http://www.u2start.com/bootlegs/1056


    Again, great... And Harry, just add your status and stuff, no-one wil remove them..
  4. Originally posted by MWSAH[..]

    Again, great... And Harry, just add your status and stuff, no-one wil remove them..


    lol have done it - perhaps I just imagined I did it first time around...

    And what's the big deal with different "kps" on bootlegs?
  5. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    lol have done it - perhaps I just imagined I did it first time around...

    And what's the big deal with different "kps" on bootlegs?


    Higher kps = better sound.
  6. Originally posted by haytrain[..]

    Higher kps = better sound.


    Oooooooooooooooooh...cheers Jeremy - still sounds like ridiculously technical jargon for an untechnical kinda chap such as myself...but I'll concur with everyone who's commented so far...

    Great stuff

  7. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    Oooooooooooooooooh...cheers Jeremy - still sounds like ridiculously technical jargon for an untechnical kinda chap such as myself...but I'll concur with everyone who's commented so far...

    Great stuff




    Actually, I'm highly un-technical myself....i'm sure someone will probably come along and give you a proper explanation....All I know is, 192kps sounds better than 96kps and 128kps.
  8. Originally posted by haytrain[..]

    Actually, I'm highly un-technical myself....i'm sure someone will probably come along and give you a proper explanation....All I know is, 192kps sounds better than 96kps and 128kps.


    Well, I think I hitherto was more un-technical lol, 'cause I didn't even know that! lol. Ignorance is bliss, as they say. Fear not, I'm off to sleep and have a bath (although not in that order, in case it sounded a tad unorthodox) aswell as make a cup of coffee...

    Auf wiedersehen/horen chaps and chappesses (although probably more the former than the latter seeing as there has been very little in the way of feminine activity on this thread for a while lol...)

  9. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    Well, I think I hitherto was more un-technical lol, 'cause I didn't even know that! lol. Ignorance is bliss, as they say. Fear not, I'm off to sleep and have a bath (although not in that order, in case it sounded a tad unorthodox) aswell as make a cup of coffee...

    Auf wiedersehen/horen chaps and chappesses (although probably more the former than the latter seeing as there has been very little in the way of feminine activity on this thread for a while lol...)




    Bye Harry...and remember: 192 kbps is better than 128 kbps for a lossy format. Losless (WAV, FLAC etc) it the best, but the files get bigger..
  10. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    Well, I think I hitherto was more un-technical lol, 'cause I didn't even know that! lol. Ignorance is bliss, as they say. Fear not, I'm off to sleep and have a bath (although not in that order, in case it sounded a tad unorthodox) aswell as make a cup of coffee...

    Auf wiedersehen/horen chaps and chappesses (although probably more the former than the latter seeing as there has been very little in the way of feminine activity on this thread for a while lol...)




    Later....
  11. Originally posted by MWSAH[..]

    Bye Harry...and remember: 192 kbps is better than 128 kbps for a lossy format. Losless (WAV, FLAC etc) it the best, but the files get bigger..



    (Well - I am not actually here but I felt inclined just to suggest that I am entirely at a loss as to what you mean by lossy formats lol...

    !)

  12. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]

    (Well - I am not actually here but I felt inclined just to suggest that I am entirely at a loss as to what you mean by lossy formats lol...

    !)




    you are due a long PM by me then