1. Thats because,

    A. We haven't used one in anger since 1945,
    and,
    B. We aren't religious zealots.

    I still think a war in Yemen is more likely.

    Thats a dumb arguement anyways. Attacking the U.S. has never brought good things too any country.
  2. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

    Killing him really cant hurt either though.

    In any case, it should be ovious by now, that terrorism will never solve anything.


    I believe that Bin Laden is just imagined guy because people need someone to blame when something happens.

    Few days ago in one documentary I found out that USA ambassy in Iraq is bigger than Vatican.
  3. Originally posted by Yogi:[..]

    I believe that Bin Laden is just imagined guy because people need someone to blame when something happens.

    Few days ago in one documentary I found out that USA ambassy in Iraq is bigger than Vatican.



    Bin Laden is real. If you want I could give you his life story. I have studied the whole thing Its actually pretty intresting. I belive in knowing ones enemy, something not enough of my countriemen do.

    Thats a damn big embasy. You got any pics?
  4. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

    Thats because,

    A. We haven't used one in anger since 1945,
    and,
    B. We aren't religious zealots.

    I still think a war in Yemen is more likely.

    Thats a dumb arguement anyways. Attacking the U.S. has never brought good things too any country.


    It's hypocratic when the US ask countries to get rid of nuclear weapons while they keep loads of them.


  5. Never said it wasen't hypocratic. I dont think theres any sane person, who whishes we coulnd't rid of them, although keeping them, keeps countries from doing dumb shit.
  6. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

    Thats because,

    A. We haven't used one in anger since 1945,
    and,
    B. We aren't religious zealots.

    I still think a war in Yemen is more likely.

    Thats a dumb arguement anyways. Attacking the U.S. has never brought good things too any country.


    A is a crap reason, you used them others didnt. And it would be a good example if you destroyed your own nukes. You have plenty of other weapons to wipe out a country any way.

    This kind of answers just add up to what many people think is the USA hypocrisy.
  7. Also, technically Iran did attack the U.S. when they took over the embasy back in 79. remeber, Embasys, counsalates, and military bases, all count as sovereign U.S. territory.
  8. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:Also, technically Iran did attack the U.S. when they took over the embasy back in 79. remeber, Embasys, counsalates, and military bases, all count as sovereign U.S. territory.


    And that's a reason why the US should invade Iran?
  9. Originally posted by Risto:[..]

    A is a crap reason, you used them others didnt. And it would be a good example if you destroyed your own nukes. You have plenty of other weapons to wipe out a country any way.

    This kind of answers just add up to what many people think is the USA hypocrisy.


    Seeing as the weapon was more or less developed for the purpose we used it for, that pretty much everyone knew we had it, and we gave them the opurtunietie too surrender before both the first one (I can see why they didn't surrender, we easily could have been bluffing), and the second one (why they didn't surrender when we gave them this chance, I'll never know) I'm really not going too lose much sleep at night over it, especially given that the Japanese commited war crimes during the invasion of China so heinous that the Nazis asked them to stop.

    Also, on a random note, I'm going to punch the next person I see wearing a Che Guevera t-shirt in the face.


  10. That plus some black and white photo of a truck in a desert. Containing weapons of mass destruction of course.

    Seems USA can get a way with every lie they play on their allies. But of course that is our own mistake.
  11. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

    Seeing as the weapon was more or less developed for the purpose we used it for, that pretty much everyone knew we had it, and we gave them the opurtunietie too surrender before both the first one (I can see why they didn't surrender, we easily could have been bluffing), and the second one (why they didn't surrender when we gave them this chance, I'll never know) I'm really not going too lose much sleep at night over it, especially given that the Japanese commited war crimes during the invasion of China so heinous that the Nazis asked them to stop.

    Also, on a random note, I'm going to punch the next person I see wearing a Che Guevera t-shirt in the face.


    Yeah well, doesnt matter that 99.99999% of the victims were innocent civilians. Or was the city a human shield full with nuclear installations. You never know with USA intelligence agencies


  12. Never said that. Just correcting you. Any militray actions should be done when they make most since, which we did, with the ill fated Operation Eagle Claw. If there was ever an op that got fucked over by bad luck, that would be it. Read up on it. While there where inteligence mistakes, and some bad planning, what the ops failure came down to was bad luck.