Originally posted by WojBhoy:Vista isn't too bad in fairness, I mean I've got used to it now. Quick question though regarding browsers - I've started using Firefox after I finally lost it with IE7, but is it me or does it not like YouTube very much?
Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]
Vista looks nice too, but is a hard pain in the ass...Glad I still have XP on my laptop. I prefer performance above graphics in this matter.
Originally posted by U2Nick:[..]
I think that Vista is a lot easier to use than XP. Vista has inferior performance to XP?
How so?
(Forgive my probably simple questions)
Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]
Easier to use? It had a lot of bugs, flaws etc. I just love XP...sense and simplicity (although it's not Philips) To each their own though.![]()
Originally posted by vanquish:Vista is much better than I thought it would be. It looks nicer as well.
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
I quite like it. Things seem to not crash as much, hardware seems to be pretty much compatible with 99.9% of drivers and it looks modern, and integrates with loads of devices like the 360. Everything is a lot easier to find and in logical English, not typical Winglish. There's so many little improvements which make Vista a bit better to use, and you can't not be impressed by them. Yet, there's some things which make me wonder why MS didn't bother to fix those, but a decent update overall.
Windows 7 Beta 1 is coming out January 9, so that should mean Win7 will almost be ready just after September this year. It looks very nice, but I sure hope the interface they're showing off is not the final one - it needs to be something totally different and new.
Winsupersite.com seems to have some great stuff about Windows 7 and the original Vista concept. Lyndon would probably know what Longhorn is, or not...
Originally posted by vanquish:[..]
Yes, I do realise that Longhorn was the working name for Vista.
I might switch over to 7 when it comes out, does it use more system resources than Vista?
Originally posted by NickI think that Vista is a lot easier to use than XP. Vista has inferior performance to XP? How so?
(Forgive my probably simple questions)
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
Just the way Vista is set up and how things work makes all the difference. XP, out of the box, is terribly set up, but you can improve it. But if you're building or buying a new computer, specificially for gaming or multimedia, Vista is the way to go with DirectX10 and all that sort of stuff and Media Centre, which I really like.