Originally posted by vanquish:Vista is much better than I thought it would be. It looks nicer as well.
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
I quite like it. Things seem to not crash as much, hardware seems to be pretty much compatible with 99.9% of drivers and it looks modern, and integrates with loads of devices like the 360. Everything is a lot easier to find and in logical English, not typical Winglish. There's so many little improvements which make Vista a bit better to use, and you can't not be impressed by them. Yet, there's some things which make me wonder why MS didn't bother to fix those, but a decent update overall.
Windows 7 Beta 1 is coming out January 9, so that should mean Win7 will almost be ready just after September this year. It looks very nice, but I sure hope the interface they're showing off is not the final one - it needs to be something totally different and new.
Winsupersite.com seems to have some great stuff about Windows 7 and the original Vista concept. Lyndon would probably know what Longhorn is, or not...
Originally posted by vanquish:[..]
Yes, I do realise that Longhorn was the working name for Vista.
I might switch over to 7 when it comes out, does it use more system resources than Vista?
Originally posted by NickI think that Vista is a lot easier to use than XP. Vista has inferior performance to XP? How so?
(Forgive my probably simple questions)
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
Just the way Vista is set up and how things work makes all the difference. XP, out of the box, is terribly set up, but you can improve it. But if you're building or buying a new computer, specificially for gaming or multimedia, Vista is the way to go with DirectX10 and all that sort of stuff and Media Centre, which I really like.
Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]
Unless they sell laptops with 512mb and Vista on it. They did it for some time here. Now they realised it didn't work that well, so the memory size is usually 2gb at the minimum now.
I think Windows 7 will be like Vista if we talk about the looks. Windows XP was, in some way, similar to good old Windows 95. Same goes for Windows 98 and ME. Vista was some new concept and they won't throw it away that easily. I hope my laptop can survive trough Vista. I might buy a new one with 7 on it. It's my favourite number afterall.
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
512MB for Vista does work. It does not work very well, unless it's Home Basic or Starter. XP was a nice-looking system, but those looks belong back in 1998. I reckon 2000 looked the best.
Originally posted by Ali709:So...a competitor for the iPhone...is it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7819352.stm
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
The Nokia 5800 Express Music should have been the phone to take on the iPhone but sadly Nokia priced it through the roof and it has slipped by relatively un-noticed. I'll get one when the price drops.
Originally posted by argyle_g:Hi everyone.
Hope somebody can help with this Ipod Query. My Ipod has started cutting off the end of newly transferred songs somtimes by up to a minute. The recordings in the library are complete and I have been sorting it by deleting off the player and re-transfering this seems to work fine. A small inconvienience but annoying![]()
Originally posted by Ali709:[..]
The Nokia is indeed looking nice, and you're right, I didn't know about it.
The Palm does look nice, guess it's a bit bulky judging by the slide-keyboard...I wanna know the price!!