DIG
Active topics
  1. They could automatically update by Windows Update. Dozens of updates get installed without the user really knowing what happens

    I am not complaining about MS though, W7 and Office 2007 are splendid. Only XP and IE6 were on for way too long. But even XP and IE6 were inovating then. First browser with AJAX support.

    Cant wait till IE9 gets out, but its a shame they dont push IE6/IE7/IE8 users too upgrade.
  2. Originally posted by Risto:They could automatically update by Windows Update. Dozens of updates get installed without the user really knowing what happens

    I am not complaining about MS though, W7 and Office 2007 are splendid. Only XP and IE6 were on for way too long. But even XP and IE6 were inovating then. First browser with AJAX support.

    Cant wait till IE9 gets out, but its a shame they dont push IE6/IE7/IE8 users too upgrade.


    But you know what'll happen when they get automatic updates - ''Someone hacked into my computer (or CPU) and gave me a thing called Internet Explorer - I use E!''

    IE9 I'll be going straight to and who knows, maybe I'll use it over Firefox and from what I've seen of Office 2007 I quite like it as with Windows 7 at the moment.
  3. I love W7, its perfect.
  4. I run Windows, but I browse on Google Chrome. Love everything about it.
  6. I know what Drew means... People here looks you strange when I open my beloved Firefox and tell me "What are you doing? You told me you were going to browse the internet"... And most of the people hasn't changed from XP to Vista, and of course to W7... It's just that Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6 have been the leading products for the general public for soooo long...

    I have Linux and Windows in my personal computer and I haven't updated from Windows XP since I have it (2004 I think)....... and, unless they come up with something that I consider better (Vista wasn't, and Windows 7 won't be - from what I've seen), I will stay with it. Windows XP is almost good!!!! (a great acomplishment, if you consider it's a Microsoft product!!)
  7. Originally posted by LikeASong:I know what Drew means... People here looks you strange when I open my beloved Firefox and tell me "What are you doing? You told me you were going to browse the internet"... And most of the people hasn't changed from XP to Vista, and of course to W7... It's just that Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6 have been the leading products for the general public for soooo long...

    I have Linux and Windows in my personal computer and I haven't updated from Windows XP since I have it (2004 I think)....... and, unless they come up with something that I consider better (Vista wasn't, and Windows 7 won't be - from what I've seen), I will stay with it. Windows XP is almost good!!!! (a great acomplishment, if you consider it's a Microsoft product!!)


    Microsoft has the balls, the brains and the ability to do things right, when they want to. Any company does but it depends on how they do it - anyone who's used iTunes and Nero from an early version right up to the later (bloated) ones will relate to that. You can come up with something awesome in theory, but if in practice it doesn't work as well as in theory, essentially you're fucked.

    Windows 7 is an example of good ideas and so is the new Windows Mobile from what we've all seen there. Internet Explorer 6 would have also been a good product had it not been released alongside such (at the time) an insecure operating system (XP) and not bolted so hard down into the OS - it might have been accepted a bit more by more technical people, not just those who don't know what a CPU or motherboard do.

    Yeah, Sergio, about Firefox - I'm getting that same reaction from many people. ''You don't have the big blue E? I thought you had the internet....I do!!!'', yet when they try Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Konqueror, Safari (although I'd avoid it if you can on Windows) they think ''Wow...my internet is way faster and my web doesn't crash!!!'' Just annoying that people are literally forced onto IE, XP, Office and all those - I know better alternatives but people hate change. I hate change, but if I try it and it works better then I'm all for the change.
  8. I don't know a better alternative for Windows Office, honestly.
    Open Office is heavier and slower (at least it's proved to be that in my computer... everytime I've tried it!!)... the only obvious positive point is that it's free.
  9. Originally posted by LikeASong:I don't know a better alternative for Windows Office, honestly.
    Open Office is heavier and slower (at least it's proved to be that in my computer... everytime I've tried it!!)... the only obvious positive point is that it's free.


    OpenOffice is an excellent alternative - a little bloated but it more than works. I think that's preferrably what I'd install - I mean, I can download Office for free just like anyone but I'd prefer OpenOffice because it works for me and I just can't get used to that new interface.

    I've tried but it's just too hard - and it's been on numerous ocassions in various moods; W7 was easy to work with but Office 07 is just too weird like IE7 / IE8. It (OpenOffice) does work nicely on Linux - that's if anyone actually wants to run it. I'd love to change all my computers to it but just people won't take the time or bother learning.
  10. A bit of a laugh here - I put W7 Home Premium on my laptop earlier tonight and already found a bug. I only have 288GB free on my hard drive of 320GB - for the OS and partitions and whatever. Just like that 4000000 days or whatever it was someone had in Vista.






    And yet, it only took 30 seconds to delete. WTF???
  11. Not really a bug, Windows estimates the amount of files and filesize. That can go wrong when there are a lot of files symlinked to each other. Only way to exactly calculate is by running through the complete file tree. That is quite slow, although it happens while deleting. But then the 'total' amount decreases through the process.

    Deleting is normally a very easy and fast operation since it only removes the index in the 'table of contents of the hardrive'.

    Normally on copy / paste operations Windows adjust their estimation during the progess.
  12. Originally posted by Risto:Not really a bug, Windows estimates the amount of files and filesize. That can go wrong when there are a lot of files symlinked to each other. Only way to exactly calculate is by running through the complete file tree. That is quite slow, although it happens while deleting. But then the 'total' amount decreases through the process.

    Deleting is normally a very easy and fast operation since it only removes the index in the 'table of contents of the hardrive'.

    Normally on copy / paste operations Windows adjust their estimation during the progess.


    It was just funny - only 320GB of space yet I magically have nearly three times as much??? Right...

    If you can help with W7, in the Music folder I want the main Music directory where the folders are set up, then going into the folder shows the Title - Type (MP3). How can I get it so the subfolders are showing Title - Artist - Album in the column headers and the main Music folder shows the directories but with the folder name and type? Sorry if I just confused you!

    Like, in Vista I used to be able to go Folder Options, click Apply to All Folders of this type and it would work then but not in 7. Of course not.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.