DIG
Active topics
  1. Gerard, you once bought the Sennheiser CX400 II? My CX300 are broke, almost dead left channel after two years. Looked for a new brand (Etymotic, Denon etc.) but I end up with Sennheiser again.
  2. Originally posted by MWSAH:Gerard, you once bought the Sennheiser CX400 II? My CX300 are broke, almost dead left channel after two years. Looked for a new brand (Etymotic, Denon etc.) but I end up with Sennheiser again.


    Couldn't recommend the C400's or the CX300-ll.

    Stick with another pair of 300's. If you can get 2 years out of them for that price then go for it.
  3. Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]

    Couldn't recommend the C400's or the CX300-ll.

    Stick with another pair of 300's. If you can get 2 years out of them for that price then go for it.


    And why not the CX400 II/CX300 II? Read some reviews saying the sound is better. Also bass-driven though. A shame I can't find the Denon AH-C700 anywhere.

    You once used the CX400 II?
  4. Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]

    And why not the CX400 II/CX300 II? Read some reviews saying the sound is better. Also bass-driven though. A shame I can't find the Denon AH-C700 anywhere.

    You once used the CX400 II?


    I did have the 400's yes. I didn't like the sound (although I didn't give them that much of a run in). Secondly, the split in the main cord is even meaning you can only wear them in front (I prefer the longer right ear cord to go around the back of my neck) and the little connector at the point where the cord splits is a bit heavy so there is a constant feeling of the headphones being pulled out of your ears.

    The CX300 ll offered no improvement over the original making the price hike useless.
  5. Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]

    I did have the 400's yes. I didn't like the sound (although I didn't give them that much of a run in). Secondly, the split in the main cord is even meaning you can only wear them in front (I prefer the longer right ear cord to go around the back of my neck) and the little connector at the point where the cord splits is a bit heavy so there is a constant feeling of the headphones being pulled out of your ears.

    The CX300 ll offered no improvement over the original making the price hike useless.


    So most cons of the CX400 are physical? I actually prefer the Y-cord, might buy them and give it a try. Thanks for the info
  6. Ditched the Sennheisers, ordered the Denon AH-C751. Big price tag compared with the Sennheisers but some German site with good comments sells it for 57 euros instead of the 150 euros here in Holland.

    Some very good reviews, downside is the large size and weight. Superb sound quality though.

  7. i've seen smaller sex toys! Jeese they are bulky


  8. Upscaled image but yes, they're somewhat bigger than the CX300. I'm all for sound though. My money is itching, I need to spend it lol.
  10. Originally posted by MWSAH:Gerard, you once bought the Sennheiser CX400 II? My CX300 are broke, almost dead left channel after two years. Looked for a new brand (Etymotic, Denon etc.) but I end up with Sennheiser again.


    My Cx300 have died in the left channel too. Mine must be getting on for 2 years. Freaky.

    I think I'm going for one's more like Ger's new set this time. Fed up of in-ear stuff.
  11. Best (free) program to convert FLAC to ALAC and/or mp3?


  12. dBpoweramp is just brilliant. To get ALAC you need to convert flac to wav then you can use itunes to convert the wav to alac.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.