DIG
Active topics
  1. Originally posted by Andrew_C:[..]

    i need help with this matter, ive always used IE but lately it has been so slow, i upgraded to IE9 and still have the same problem. sometimes the pages load straight away, other times they take up to 30seconds. what i dunt understand though is that while all this is happening ive got utorrent open which is still going at fast speeds

    will changing to Firefox or google chrome fix this, cheers for any advice guys.


    Your first mistake was using IE.

    If your machine is light on power, you'd be better off with Chrome. I like FF (not 4!) but when it's loaded up with extensions it's a bit of a resource hog.
  2. Originally posted by Risto:Hard to say what the cause is. Easiest way is to just try out another browser. If that doesnt help there are several possible causes.


    are browsers easy to get rid of though, like if i got chrome and it didnt fix the issue could i go back to IE9 without too much hassle
  3. Originally posted by sonia_lastrega:[..]

    Your first mistake was using IE.

    If your machine is light on power, you'd be better off with Chrome. I like FF (not 4!) but when it's loaded up with extensions it's a bit of a resource hog.


    my machine is a beast so running firefox should be fine. Chrome vs FF which is easier to use?
  4. Easy to uninstall

    Anyway all modern browsers are pretty competetitve speed-wise. So just pick one.


  5. Considering the newer IE versions copy the FF interface pretty heavily, you'd probably find FF easier to get used to. The best thing about FF is how customisable it is and all the nifty shit you can do with extensions (save videos, audio, block ads, block cookies/scripts, etc etc). If you like setting your machine up exactly how you like it, then FF is for you.
  8. Cheers for the help
  9. Deleting part of my u2 bootleg collection. I am not crazy to buy yet another hd to fill with stuff i barely listen / watch. Noticed the more you got the less you listen (B-man was not wrong).

    Saves money and I might actually listen to some more recordings, still sucks to delete though
  10. Start for the video, Chris. One video bootleg weighs as much as 5 or 10 audio recordings...
  11. Yeah, deleted some single / partial / hd shots. Also drastically reducing the ammount of 'unlistenable' audience recordings.
  12. Originally posted by Risto:Deleting part of my u2 bootleg collection. I am not crazy to buy yet another hd to fill with stuff i barely listen / watch. Noticed the more you got the less you listen (B-man was not wrong).

    Saves money and I might actually listen to some more recordings, still sucks to delete though


    how many GB/TB of data did u have?
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.