Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
the results are top though
ImTOO has never let me down so far so I give it a second chance tomorrow.
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
the results are top though
Originally posted by MWSAH[..]
ImTOO has never let me down so far so I give it a second change tomorrow.
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
Good ZooTV gig this week. Did you see the snapshots?
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
I did. Stockholm?
Originally posted by MWSAHAnother question: Why is FLAC preferred above WAV as they both are losless?
Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]
The file size. FLAC is usually 25% - 50% less than what a wave file is. Wave files are always 1411Kbps regardless (the bit rate of a true audio CD) but FLAC can be 700-900Kbps depending on what level of FLAC you choose from 0-8. Usually I go about FLAC2 depending on how good the original CD was encoded.
And yep, they both are indeed lossless. I prefer FLAC because of the size. Wave is only good if I want a true to form audio rip of a new CD.
Originally posted by MWSAH[..]
Allright, very clear explanation. Thanks Drew
Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]
No worries.
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
WAV is also mighty convenient as it will play through itunes and import on to your iPod. Portable lossless is good (if your headphones are up to the task)
Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]
Do decent headphones actually sound good with the classic, or the same?
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
anything is an improvement over the standards. Stick with the CX300'S and set your EQ to trble booster and if you get the right sized bud you are flying