1. Originally posted by aussiemofo[..]

    How about the sax..


    How about mandolin? Losing My Religion is just brilliant.
  2. Originally posted by zooTV4all[..]

    What hell would he think be relevant then?? That person "yeah" is a very very demanding person.
    More irritating than an insect.



    Watch it there...I actually respect the man for his opinions...it's all logical and he sticks to them, which is pretty damn good
  3. Originally posted by Ali709[..]

    Watch it there...I actually respect the man for his opinions...it's all logical and he sticks to them, which is pretty damn good


    I respect him too, I just don't want a new Pop-flop.
  4. Originally posted by zooTV4all[..]

    How about mandolin? Losing My Religion is just brilliant.



    its great song But i think Studo verison of COBL has mandolin on it. At least my mother and I do LOL.
  5. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    Worst case scenario for me would be a "Window in the skies" album. Awful vision.


    Agreed. Bono's mention of "psychedelic pop" a few months back still has me worried.
  6. Originally posted by zooTV4all[..]

    How about mandolin? Losing My Religion is just brilliant.



    Even better example is "Rise" - song by Eddie Vedder.
  7. hey guys guess what.....the album is finished. in the can.

    this isn't supposed to be revelatory....im just excited
  8. This album is very influenced by what 60s artists did. They vacationed out in Morocco (I think).

    The Beatles..... not the cheesy crap from 1963-1965. I'm talking about Revolver's George Harrison stuff. Fuck Eleanor Rigby. Her time was in ATYCLB.

    This album, if anything will be largely influenced by later 60s stuff, the better half of the 60s.

    Jimi Hendrix style stuff? That would be crazy. If anything, can Edge do what Pete Townshend did and start smashing guitars? THAT, would be awesome.

    So sure, Bono wants to be like John Lennon more and more each album. Whatever. Edge is still from the future. Larry will drum like Mitch Mitchell (JImi Hendrix stuff). Adam, will still play the way he does, but I see that he will be more featured in this album.

    If I have learned anything, its that deserts produce the best music:

    Where the Streets Have No Name
    Paint It Black

    ok, maybe thats all I can come up with for now, but I know that they know what they're doing:

    It will be a U2 album, nothing like what we've seen, ever. Thats what U2 does. I'm pretty sure they are sick of stereotypical rock stuff.

    As for the Achtung 2 idea.... NO. We want the same level of innovation as Achtung, which I think will definitely happen.

    Why? Because U2 isn't the kind of band to keep doing the same thing. Thats what the Rolling Stones and the Who and the Beatles and every other band did. They all wanted to have a trademark sound. U2 has no history, which is why they have come up with everything awesome. The Joshua Tree, Achtung, and Pop are their innovative successes. The Joshua Tree - taking a look at American music. Not the 80s shit, but REAL american music like R&B and the blues, which created rock to begin with. Achtung, where they decided to make a new sound..... that sound which BECAME the 90s. Pop, the underrated Pop, now being hailed because the club scene is now bigger than ever. The ideas which were their own, what they wanted to exemplify in their albums made them who they are today. Whatever they are making has some sort of theme. If its as big as the three I've mentioned, we have a winner.
  9. Originally posted by stj0691
    Pop, the underrated Pop, now being hailed because the club scene is now bigger than ever.



    to defend electronic/club music.. it was my first love and it came out well before u2's pop.

    as far as the individual songs go for pop.. i dont hear techno influences at all. period. on achtung baby! yes, definately techno influenced.

    yes u2's popmart was the "rave" rock n roll show, but raves and club music was along well before the POP album. paul oakenfold, sasha, digweed, paul van dyk, pete tong, dj icey, frankie bones, danny teneglia, ralph rosario, BT, Keoki, Prodigy, Chemical Bros, etc.. these guys made the club scene what it is today.

    u2 was the only rock band i think that took a stab at electronic music.

    being heavily involved in the club music scene and seeing how dead it is (at least here in tampa) i don't think trance influences will go over well. probably in europe though.

    my .02

  10. Originally posted by Ariees[..]


    to defend electronic/club music.. it was my first love and it came out well before u2's pop.

    as far as the individual songs go for pop.. i dont hear techno influences at all. period. on achtung baby! yes, definately techno influenced.

    yes u2's popmart was the "rave" rock n roll show, but raves and club music was along well before the POP album. paul oakenfold, sasha, digweed, paul van dyk, pete tong, dj icey, frankie bones, danny teneglia, ralph rosario, BT, Keoki, Prodigy, Chemical Bros, etc.. these guys made the club scene what it is today.

    u2 was the only rock band i think that took a stab at electronic music.

    being heavily involved in the club music scene and seeing how dead it is (at least here in tampa) i don't think trance influences will go over well. probably in europe though.

    my .02




    woah.... what an awesome post I must say. all those artists that I might like, very awesome list!

    my post was meant to say something along the lines of "U2 has made their own sound with highly respected influences, and their most innovative comes from the cream of the crop."

    and up here in the northeast the club scene... i have no idea lol.
  11. Originally posted by stj0691[..]

    woah.... what an awesome post I must say.

    my post was meant to say something along the lines of "U2 has made their own sound with highly respected influences, and their most innovative comes from the cream of the crop."

    and up here in the northeast the club scene... i have no idea lol.


    haha my bad. i took your post the wrong way..

    i feel that u2's tours and albums in the 90s were totally techno based and influenced.

    in the 00s hip hop and pop music was huge. i dont really see how ATYCLB AND HTDAAB fit in with the music influences of the era.

    today's music really sucks if you ask me. now-a-days im into linkin park, newsboys, keane, coldplay, toby mac, lots of christian based music.

    as far as pop music though... regetone, hip hop (which still sucks in my opinion) etc.. pop music is not good now a days.

    i would love to see u2 start a totally new sound that will ride a wave for 10 years of future music style similar to how achtung baby paved the way for techno music.

  12. Originally posted by Ariees[..]

    haha my bad. i took your post the wrong way..

    i feel that u2's tours and albums in the 90s were totally techno based and influenced.

    in the 00s hip hop and pop music was huge. i dont really see how ATYCLB AND HTDAAB fit in with the music influences of the era.

    today's music really sucks if you ask me. now-a-days im into linkin park, newsboys, keane, coldplay, toby mac, lots of christian based music.

    as far as pop music though... regetone, hip hop (which still sucks in my opinion) etc.. pop music is not good now a days.

    i would love to see u2 start a totally new sound that will ride a wave for 10 years of future music style similar to how achtung baby paved the way for techno music.




    hey! it was still a good post you made!

    the ONLY ONLY ONLY hip hop artist i listen to is Kanye West, and only about 20 songs. I like the Graduation LP and nothing more. I like the concept.

    ALSO...some of the music today is good, not great though. Viva la Vida is an example of great. I Kissed a Girl is an example of "sucky".

    and U2 will make another great innovative album, I stand by that