1. Originally posted by Yogi[..]

    Maybe for the same reason why they didn't release "Until the End of The World" as a single? Or...?



    Something tells me they didn't get released for similar reasons...
  2. Originally posted by Yogi[..]

    U2 never made horrible song.



    And the pope is a protestant.
  3. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    And the pope is a protestant.

    Probably is lol
  4. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    And the pope is a protestant.


    Name a horrible U2 song.
  5. Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2[..]

    Name a horrible U2 song.

    Bernard.
  6. Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2[..]

    Name a horrible U2 song.


    Only one? Stuck in a moment.
  7. Originally posted by yeah[..]
    Only one? Stuck in a moment.

    Pssch, that's a great song in my opinion, but each to their own
  8. Originally posted by yeah[..]

    Only one? Stuck in a moment.


    Ah. Very true.
    Actually, I'd also add Boy-Girl.
  9. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Bernard.


    Was this from the Passengers sessions?
  10. Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2[..]

    Was this from the Passengers sessions?


    Ha, maybe maybe

    What you got against SIAMYCGOO, other than the incredibly lengthy name?
  11. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Ha, maybe maybe

    What you got against SIAMYCGOO, other than the incredibly lengthy name?


    Eh, I think the tempo mostly. 99% of U2 songs are elevating, and this one doesn't seem to get off the ground. It's also a bit too radio-friendly.
    But that's just me.
  12. Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
    Ha, maybe maybe

    What you got against SIAMYCGOO, other than the incredibly lengthy name?


    I think it's just boring. No climax, no change, nothing. The lyrics are the typical 00's Kitsch.
    Plus, the way the chorus is sung makes my toenails curl.