Originally posted by markp91:[..]
You mean the new mixes from Discotheque, SATS and Gone? Personally I like those (except for SATS) better than the original, but everyone to his own....
Originally posted by MWSAH:If they need to postpone the album to make it better, why not? I want a good album, if that means more time to wait, I can live with that. I want the best, not some half-produced album.
Originally posted by djrlewis:I notice my scan is now on Interference and by due process Scatter O Light. How cool's that?!
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
Were u credited? Darn leechers. . Cool tho
Originally posted by djrlewis:I notice my scan is now on Interference and by due process Scatter O Light. How cool's that?!
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
Were u credited? Darn leechers. . Cool tho
Originally posted by haytrain:[..]
Next time you'll place a U2start.com watermark on anything like that, huh?
Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2:I'm still betting on a November 2008 release. Praying, actually, might be a better word.
A bit of research:
It was September 14 of 2004 that atu2.com revealed that RTE had revealed that u2.com had revealed that the official U2 camp had revealed the album title and album release date.
http://www.atu2.com/news/article.src?ID=3500&Key=new%20album&Year=&Cat=.
That could, and most likely does, mean nothing, but it still might give us a bit if hope that we'll at least hear something in the next...millenium.
Originally posted by aussiemofo:[..]
They need a decent lead-in time for the Christmas season so November is on the money.
*Nods his head as if he knows what's going on.