Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
I think releasing an album or albums with a crapload of new songs would be a bad idea. They don't want people to have to try and grasp 60+ songs, they want to put out 11 memorable songs. And I'm sure even though they've said they've written 60+ songs doesn't mean they're all good. They talked about releasing a double album for the Joshua Tree, with all the songs, (B-sides and originals) but when the B-Sides came out a year ago, a lot of people thought they sucked. Not the hardcore fans like us, but people that like U2 the same way they like any other band.
And what's wrong with live b-sides? Spanish Eyes and Silver & Gold were good on the JT tour, and they were b-sides.
Live B-sides (like Kite from Sydney 2006), not B-sides that were played live (Spanish Eyes), unless they are epic like Kite.
Dear Bono, Edge, Larry and Adam,
Please do not make a 4-hour cd.
I wouldn't be able to learn all the lyrics out of the top of my head before the tour reaches Rotterdam.
Kind regards,
Mark from Boxtel, The Netherlands
PS Could you guys come over here and play Electrical Storm and Acrobat at my school? Would love to see that!
Again, not just snippets, but quality, full-length songs that can be played live, like Wave of Sorrow.