1. All I want to say is that I love november . birhtday Nov 24. what a great treat every couple of years a new album is released right around my birthday . and every coulpe of years here in the states Thanksgiving falls on my b-day so I get a big ass meal cooked for me and I can pig out and listen to U2 all day
  2. Originally posted by bones44044All I want to say is that I love november . birhtday Nov 24. what a great treat every couple of years a new album is released right around my birthday . and every coulpe of years here in the states Thanksgiving falls on my b-day so I get a big ass meal cooked for me and I can pig out and listen to U2 all day


    lucky ba....you
  3. Originally posted by drewhiggins


    It would surprise me if the album was delayed because of it. But as I mentioned once before, the sound engineers just take the original analogue tapes, do a bit of mastering, upgrading and editing...



    Basically, they ruin the whole thing and then sell it as if it was something better than the originals.
  4. Originally posted by thechicken[..]

    Basically, they ruin the whole thing and then sell it as if it was something better than the originals.


    Would you then happen to have the same opinion as me and go as far to say the *upgraded* sound quality of JT sucks big-time and sounds lifeless?

    The DVD's pretty good though. I quite enjoyed it but there's like a green shade effect on certain songs like a magnet is near the camera.
  5. Originally posted by drewhiggins[..]

    Would you then happen to have the same opinion as me and go as far to say the *upgraded* sound quality of JT sucks big-time and sounds lifeless?

    The DVD's pretty good though. I quite enjoyed it but there's like a green shade effect on certain songs like a magnet is near the camera.


    Actually, I didn't hear it, I don't have it...but I have never ever heard a remaster that sounded better than the original, so it's a rule for me...Originals>Remasters. I see no reason for messing up things that are already finished and great souding.
  6. Originally posted by thechicken[..]

    Actually, I didn't hear it, I don't have it...but I have never ever heard a remaster that sounded better than the original, so it's a rule for me...Originals>Remasters. I see no reason for messing up things that are already finished and great souding.


    i think there is no doubt that the remaster of JT is clearer, more crisp than the original, doesn't mean i listen to it a lot, but it definitely is an improvement.
  7. I think remastered JT is way better than the original one. When I listened to it for the first time on my mp3 player I was amazed with some fantastic details that couldn't be heard on the original.
  8. Originally posted by YogiI think remastered JT is way better than the original one. When I listened to it for the first time on my mp3 player I was amazed with some fantastic details that couldn't be heard on the original.


    When I heard One Tree Hill and the drums during Bullet my jaw just hit the floor.
  9. The remaster was way better than the original and im waiting for October so i can rediscover it and listen to it properly
  10. mothers of the disappeared blow me away on the remasterd JT
    KKKKKAAAAAAAAAAAAAABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM !!!!
  11. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    When I heard One Tree Hill and the drums during Bullet my jaw just hit the floor.


    yes
  12. Originally posted by YogiI think remastered JT is way better than the original one. When I listened to it for the first time on my mp3 player I was amazed with some fantastic details that couldn't be heard on the original.


    Yep, agree

    and with Gerard lol..