Originally posted by thefly07so to get this back on topic, lately, and as far as I know all together, only Lanois has been vocal about the sessions. How much is Eno really involved in this one? I haven't heard too many reports of him at the studio (albeit i haven't been paying too much attention) but it seems that Lanois has really been the one dishing out the info etc. Just haven't heard much about Eno's presence/influence on the sessions, aside from Morocco. converse...
Originally posted by stj0691[..]
wasn't their supposed to be something in his movie about U2?
Originally posted by thechickenThat was an awesome post...Remasters=shit ALWAYS!!!
Mp3 is the same as listening to 1/4 of the original song...but a little worse.
Analog>Digital ALWAYS!!!
Originally posted by thefly07[..]
technical mumbo jumbo lol
i think it sounds great and i'm excited for the new re-releases, primarily for the unheard tracksand new pictures and Edge's notes
Originally posted by thechicken[..]
I understand you excitement and your bad tasteBut remasters for me are just a way to make more money...the tracks were not good back then for going to the album, but now they put it there as if they were great things...
Just my opinion
Originally posted by thefly07[..]
lol.....as a U2 fan, if it says U2 on it I'm gonna buy it without question...especially if it's official...idk i'm a U2 addict, kinda guy who buys their items on the day they come out, which i've done since ATYCLB
Originally posted by thechicken[..]
I know this raceCollect vinyl singles too? Or all the 64546745 version of the same single?
Originally posted by thefly07[..]
lol i'm not that obsessed, i confess, most of what i have is just the basic official material, I have a few LPs and singles but nothing extremely rare...most of my collection is in bootlegs
Originally posted by thechicken[..]
I see...that is good...having one thing or another is nice...but 10 billion versions of the same thing is a bit unhealthy.