1. they're not gonna do that. They'd make a lot more money releasing Blood Red Sky by itself (Which is why they're releasing it soon)...
  2. Originally posted by easports43:[..]

    they're not gonna do that. They'd make a lot more money releasing Blood Red Sky by itself (Which is why they're releasing it soon)...


    not any of the tracks on the album but leftovers like Twilight, An Cat Dubh and Into The Heart on the sweetest thing single
  3. what are you guys talking about exactly?


  4. That's why Wayne was suggesting using some of the Red Rocks audio. But like I said earlier, it's a bigger cash cow if they release UABRS on its own...

    And there were few B-Sides, so they had no choice but to release 87 remixes of New Year's Day.
  5. Originally posted by easports43:[..]

    That's why Wayne was suggesting using some of the Red Rocks audio. But like I said earlier, it's a bigger cash cow if they release UABRS on its own...


    loads of the Red Rocks tracks have already been released as b-sides already so everyone would have been saying 'boo hoo theres nothing new'.
  6. Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]

    loads of the Red Rocks tracks have already been released as b-sides already so everyone would have been saying 'boo hoo theres nothing new'.


    yep...

    and some of Loreley was used for Blood Red Sky (correct?), so those tracks were probably out of the picture...
  7. Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]

    loads of the Red Rocks tracks have already been released as b-sides already so everyone would have been saying 'boo hoo theres nothing new'.


    but the remixes ant new ether