Originally posted by justinpushplay:[..]
Really? I like SOI and SOE more than No Line and Atomic Bomb..they were more successful under Paul but I've loved the last two records.
Originally posted by grzeko:[..]
Oh, hi Guy
Seriously, I think he's the worst thing that happened to U2. Ever.
Originally posted by podiumboy:[..]
But what happened with SOI was a PR nightmare, bigger than a stupid, unnecessary movie or a tour with some mediocre attendance numbers. It wasn’t handled well at all. Luckily U2’s legacy is big enough to withstand the hit, but it did more harm than good by far.
Originally posted by popmarter:[..]
It might have annoyed a few self absorbed apple geeks but they got their music heard by half a billion people a lot of whom would never buy a U2 record and the whole world was talking about them all of their back catalogue went back into the charts ,the tour was a huge success and sold out everywhere so job done
Originally posted by podiumboy:[..]
So he's actually going to start managing U2 now?
Dude dropped the ball with SOI. Not only with the release, but with the aftermath. And then once Bono had his bike injury, ALL promotion of SOI just stopped.
Originally posted by Welsh_Edge:Invisible's release was a dry run for SOI, at least it seems that way to me. They screwed up because it went into everyone's library rather than just being free on the store.
Originally posted by superchuk5:[..]
I often think about how such a small change in the release could’ve prevented the whole fiasco. Truly incredible no one thought of this.