U2start.com | Latest U2 News / Sightings

RattleandHum1988

Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3Think of it this way- if dreaming it all back up again was what happened from 89-91, and then reapplying for the best band in the world was what happened between 98-00, dreaming it all back down again is what needs to happen from 11-12.

They just need to strip it back. Imagine some of the craft of their 80's work matched with Danger Mouse's incredible production. Just need a little soul-searching soundwise.

Sorry man, but I disagree. I don't think U2 needs to backtrack in their art as a band, and they've never thought that way anyway. It's all about moving forward onto new things. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you want something along the lines of The Joshua Tree or All That You Can't Leave Behind. I'm the opposite. I'm hoping for something along the lines of Passengers part 2. Not in the same intensity, obviously, that was an experimental side project not intended for radio or anything. But I'm hoping for the same amount of experimentation in terms of fudging up their sound.

iTim

13 years

hamman

13 years

Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:Think of it this way- if dreaming it all back up again was what happened from 89-91, and then reapplying for the best band in the world was what happened between 98-00, dreaming it all back down again is what needs to happen from 11-12.

They just need to strip it back. Imagine some of the craft of their 80's work matched with Danger Mouse's incredible production. Just need a little soul-searching soundwise.

I agree. I think they should make the new record truly of just the four of them creating the music. They shouldn't play songs without additional production on this one. I think thats what makes the songs special. Just the four of them playing off of each other.

Mr_Trek

13 years

Originally posted by iTim[YouTube Video]

Cool.

RattleandHum1988

13 years

Originally posted by hamman[..]

I agree. I think they should make the new record truly of just the four of them creating the music. They shouldn't play songs without additional production on this one. I think thats what makes the songs special. Just the four of them playing off of each other.

I think at one point in time they were capable of this (pre-1990) but because they've gotten so used to having those extra elements, we wouldn't get something up to par with those efforts. We'd probably get something more along the lines of ATYCLB or HTAAB, which seem to be huge targets for many people around here. I think they've tried the "dream it back down again" approach over the past decade, ending with NLOTH which was that same principle but with a few over-produced songs (album version of Boots). How can you get more to the core than White As Snow? You really want an entire album with songs like that? No thanks. If I want folk music I'll listen to folk. If I want big ideas, atmospheric and anthemic rock, I'll listen to U2 thank you very much! One of the main reasons many of us love U2 are because they're so versatile in their craft. So many of their albums could be categorized under different genres. I'd rather see them try something new again than go back to basics, AGAIN. Those guys were born to "fuck up the mainstream", not join it by copying artists like Bon Iver or whatever.

iTim

13 years

Don't know when this was recorded, (RED) just posted it on Facebook: