Originally posted by ahn1991:Bono would not be Bono without the schmoozing and philanthropy. Let Bono do what Bono does. Plus, you can't force an album to be produced quicker than it's intended to. I'm probably going to get a lot of crap for this, but remember Pop?
Originally posted by ahn1991:...remember Pop?
Originally posted by ahn1991:We say that Bono should change his persona, but let's remember that Bono's been doing the political schmoozing for quite a while. I wouldn't say that this has any influence on the band's musical direction. U2 without Bono's activism is U2 no longer. That's pretty much how I see it.
Plus, didn't we already get news that U2 wouldn't release something until 2013 anyways?