GEN
Active topics
  1. Pointless appearance on the show. Nothing to tell.
  2. Fighting terrorism by curing AIDS. Really Bono? I truly support what he's doing but this argument is just cheap.

    About fans and album : 'They don't mind waiting as long as it's great.' Guess what Bono, I'll show up at your doorstep and I'll beat the shit out of you. Me and Larry together. <3
  3. Jesus - folk need to calm down a bit...
  5. Originally posted by Yogi:Fighting terrorism by curing AIDS. Really Bono? I truly support what he's doing but this argument is just cheap.

    About fans and album : 'They don't mind waiting as long as it's great.' Guess what Bono, I'll show up at your doorstep and I'll beat the shit out of you. Me and Larry together. &lt;3

    What he said makes a lot of sense actually. If the terrorist organizations can't gain supporters then they can't set up shop in new places.
  7. Originally posted by kris_smith87:[..]

    What he said makes a lot of sense actually. If the terrorist organizations can't gain supporters then they can't set up shop in new places.

    Let just not continue with politics because it would be wrong the same way his argument is. We should fund AIDS research and treatment because it's right thing to do, not because stupid politics.
  8. I'm also very impatient and want the new album out as soon as possible. The reason I feel like we all want it out soon, besides getting a new U2 album, is the fact that they're old. We don't want it to be their last album. But to be honest, I would rather wait and have them release an amazing final album than 2 or 3 rushed, crap albums that won't make it close to the public eye. I support their idea on relevance. How awesome would it be to turn on MTV, VH1, the radio and hear U2 again? Maybe if they're relevant again, they'll make more records. I want them to have a (most likely) last album be viewed as a masterpiece. Not only to us, because we think every album is great, but people who only love the hits, or are not even familiar with U2. It's time for them to restart again, but it's harder to do that in your 50's instead of your late 20's-early 30's. I want an album soon, but I want it to be perfect, and if that means just waiting a few months, then I'm fine with that. SORRY FOR THE LONG POST!!!!!
  9. They wont ever be as relevant as they were. I can see them scoring some hits,but thats it. Live they can be relevant, the 360 tour was a success on all levels.


  10. "false" reason .. there's someone who made 10 albums since he turned 53 for example ... and no he's not Bruce, he made only 6 hehe
    it's not a matter of age but will
  11. Originally posted by clover68:[..]


    "false" reason .. there's someone who made 10 albums since he turned 53 for example ... and no he's not Bruce, he made only 6 hehe
    it's not a matter of age but will


    sure then can still playing for many years like the Rolling Stones but i think they are not that kind ... i think when they see that they can t do anything that the world like , they are going to retire .... they want to be on top if not ... they go home ...and Bono will be happy being a politician
  12. How can a band be relevant with 1 album every 4 years? The band are delusional.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.