1. I like the performances.

    The thing that is worrying me is that we get more and more used to the EDIT version of Invisible, or more precise: that U2 are going to get used to playing this (shorter) version live, which diminishes the chance of getting a 'full' album version..... I would love the album version to survive and be 5 or 6 minutes. (This 3 minutes is to short!)
  2. I like it too ... beatiful OL and Invisible with growth potential ... or they played too good or i m the only one who doubt about the music if it is live or not
  3. Big boost from Fallon on ITunes. Both songs in top 100. Biggest surprise is OL is 56. Invisible is 93. I looked over weekend and OL was like 35 on soundtracks ITunes list so that performance gave a lot of play. I think U2 are crazy to wait until June for this album. They will lose so much momentum,
    So rumor or album coming in April from Dallas to a fan on Monday to me is legit.
  4. Originally posted by patou2:I like it too ... beatiful OL and Invisible with growth potential ... or they played too good or i m the only one who doubt about the music if it is live or not

    Thought that for a brief opening second, but the vocals are live, Edge is live (solo). Adam and Larry too, but there is a significant amount of pre-recorded stuff going on as well.
  5. Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]

    Thought that for a brief opening second, but the vocals are live, Edge is live (solo). Adam and Larry too, but there is a significant amount of pre-recorded stuff going on as well.

    i thought the same ... there few details that show that there are some live stuff but sure there are some pre-recorded . Anyway i love it !
  6. just watched the show, nice performances, great to see them playing live again.
  7. I like Invisible better than OL but the performance of OL was way better last night. Great acoustic performance. Bono sounded amazing
  8. Originally posted by u2joost:So, does this mean that those 8 drumband-boys will have to go on tour with U2? What are they doing there and does it really add to the performance?


    To answer this question, no. They were the drumline from a local university in New Jersey called Rutgers. Fallon was saying the whole night how he wanted to represent New York on the new show, and this was just a bonus shout out for their friends across the river. I would be shocked if they appeared again next to the band at any performance.
  9. Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:I like Invisible better than OL but the performance of OL was way better last night. Great acoustic performance. Bono sounded amazing

    QFT.

    All that needs to be said, really.
  10. Originally posted by u2joost:I like the performances.

    The thing that is worrying me is that we get more and more used to the EDIT version of Invisible, or more precise: that U2 are going to get used to playing this (shorter) version live, which diminishes the chance of getting a 'full' album version..... I would love the album version to survive and be 5 or 6 minutes. (This 3 minutes is to short!)

    You are assuming that a longer version exists, but there's no proof it does. We only have that "[EDIT]" bit in the iTunes downloaded file, which indicated it's a special edit for the (RED) release, everything else is wild guessing imo.
  11. On further listens I'm liking the Invisible performance now. The first time it seemed a bit off.
    OL performance is amazing, except for that semi-existing drummer guy

    Good to see them live and enjoying themselves, you can tell that Bono is really happy to be performing live like this again. And his vocals are amazing, I could say he's performing the best between the 4 of them.
  12. I agree Ali. Edge is a bit shabby, Adam can't be heard at all during Ordinary Love (unplugged bass?) and Larry... Well,