Originally posted by LikeASong:A Starcaster is also on my sight, Harry... It's a "different" guitar, and moreover it looks and sounds awesome
It also has an abominable price tag
Originally posted by LikeASong:A Starcaster is also on my sight, Harry... It's a "different" guitar, and moreover it looks and sounds awesome
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
It also has an abominable price tag
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Really? Never found one in any of the physical stores I've been in. And haven't seeked for it on the internet...
He's right, the price is high, especially for students like I know we both are.. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Really? Never found one in any of the physical stores I've been in. And haven't seeked for it on the internet...
Originally posted by LikeASong:A Starcaster is also on my sight, Harry... It's a "different" guitar, and moreover it looks and sounds awesome
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:It also has an abominable price tag
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:Apparnetly this is the cool thing to do....I have a strat because I love the sound it gives, it's not my problem if Hendrix, Gilmour, Edge, SRV, Clapton, and a shitload of other guitarists love the sound a strat gives as well. I'm not going to get a "different" guitar so I can stand out, i'm going to get what sounds good.
Originally posted by WojBhoy:[..]
[..]
What the man said.
[..]
Amen to that. There's a reason why Strats are as successful as they are - they're good. Need there be more reason to get a guitar? My Explorer is my #1 because I feel it's the best guitar, but also it has a balance to the sound - I feel it comes somewhere between the thickness and grit of a Les Paul crossed with the definition of a Strat. Speaking of Strats, I've been playing my Ridgewood copy quite a lot recently, loving clean tones on the middle/bridge pickup. My Les Paul, on the other hand...if there was one guitar I was going to consider selling, it would be that. Saying that, I'm far too attached to it lol =/
Originally posted by LikeASong:A Starcaster is also on my sight, Harry... It's a "different" guitar, and moreover it looks and sounds awesome


Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:To be honest I think It's kind of ugly. Very different, but not my thing at all. I definitely prefer the look of a 335 over the starcaster. The sound on those things are freakin amazing though, and the headstock is sick, but the body itself isn't for me.
It is a 335's hipper, more stylish Fender cousin.
Originally posted by anstratdubh1979:[..]
That's odd you'd say that as the body itself, is pretty "335-ish".It is a 335's hipper, more stylish Fender cousin.
![]()
Looks it is unique. And soundwise they sound great.![]()
But to each their own. That leaves one less person competing for one once I go looking for one. So I'm more than cool with that.![]()
![]()
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
You're right it is more stylish and hip looking, which is probably why it's not appealing to me. I like the super classic look of the 335 body.![]()
Where are you going to find one though? I've seen only one or two on ebay. and they've always gone for a shitload of money. I'm going down to New York this summer, and I'm DEFINITELY hitting up that street with all of the vintage guitar shops. I'm going to see if I can get my hands on a 50's-70's strat![]()
Originally posted by thechicken:[..]
You will surely need a lot of money to get a 50s-70s strat. As far as basses go, I have always heard that the 70s instruments are pretty inconsistent in quality, meaning that it is likely that you pay a lot for a bad instrument. Watch out for that. Poor neck placement, heavy instruments with bad sounds,etc...