Originally posted by bcgd[..]
Exactly. His guitars are his livelihood so he's going to do whatever to them to get the sound he wants and perform to his liking the same way one of us would upgrade a computer for our job. His return on investment is album sales not to mention his guitars to a certain extent are a business write off.
Originally posted by anstratdubh1979[..]
But keep in mind, when Edge got the first of his Les Paul Customs... it wasn't an investment or it being vintage. He got the 1975 in 1982. He wasn't buying "vintage" he was buying a second hand LP that was like Steve Jones of The Sex Pistols.
Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Continuing off from what the others have said, I'm assuming he wasn't buying it with the intention of selling it on for whatever reason, he was probably buying it as a long-term 'investment' for musical purposes (as you'd expect it to) - I doubt the value of the guitar was a priority for him, and thus I don't agree with your point in this context. If he were a collector and was buying as a collector (and potential seller), I'd agree with your thinking. However, don't forget, any guitar he plays has no doubt shot up in value because he's played it, and whatever modifications he's made will affect the value because he's seen to such adjusments. Shit, look how much the '75 (or '73) LP went for on the Music Rising auction! Not to mention the backup Explorer
You people made a great point that it was not a vintage guitar when he got it, this thought had not crosses my mind. About the price of the guitar, I mean that I don't see the point in changing the pick ups because I like things to sound vintage, and I think that vintage guitars are mostly about tone, I was never talking about the monetary value of the instrument.