Originally posted by yeah[..]
And if Holy Bono said it, it must be true...
C'mon, even you must admit that the quality of songwriting, the spirit of the shows, the live performances were way better in the past....
As FlowerChild said - it was different. They were different. You were different.
For example, when I started to explore U2 at a time when Vertigo single was released on few forums I read about all U2 albums, and everyone was spitting on Pop and Bomb. They are unfinished, commercial (the funniest argument in the world!), yada, yada, yada... And I thought "These people listen to U2 for years, so they must be right." I listened to these two album, but didn't get into them. So I left them behind, I just didn't listen to them. After like 2 years when I was already totally into U2 I started to ask myself...I like every single U2 song, but I never listen to Pop and Bomb. Why? And I gave them enough time and found that Pop and Bomb are great albums, just like every other U2 album.
Same was with "Elvis Presley and America". No one likes it, but I think it's one of the most brilliant U2 songs.
Today I enjoy bootlegs from all tours and I don't find any tour bad or better than others. They're, just like albums - different colors of the same rainbow.