1. I understood that.

    I nominate you for weirdest post of the year

    (Hopefully we can blow Dublin up next year )
  2. I would rather blow my house up than damaging a single square centimeter of the sacred city.
  3. Originally posted by LikeASongI would rather blow my house up than damaging a single square centimeter of the sacred city.


    I had those thoughts as well. I'm sure that if we ask Bono, he'll tell us of a few unsacred places.
  4. i'm watching (for the n-th time) "Darkness on the edge of town Paramount Theater Asbury Park 2009" .. can't wait to see him once again .. "only" 6 months ...

    by the way i read somewhere he won't replace Clarence (:. ) neither with another saxophonist nor with a horn section that was another rumor
  5. How are they going to play those sax songs then? They could drop some songs, but I dont think he could drop Born To Run for example.
  6. it's not a problem for him to drop classics .. anyway i'm very curious about that indeed.
    it's another rumor i heard but i don't really know how solid it can be
  7. Isnt Born To Run a kind of Streets, as in they almost play it at every show?
  8. yes often not always though .. Born to run, Thunder road and Badlands, i guess, should be the most frequently songs played over the years
  9. The audience can sing the sax parts. They drown Clarence during Born To Run on the Barcelona DVD...
  10. maybe they'll just use a recording
  11. i hope and think not
  12. Originally posted by clover68i hope and think not


    +1.


    I was listening to a couple of Springsteen classic earlier this morning and I truly realized HOW MUCH will Clarence be missed, specially in songs like Jungleland, Thunder Road or Born To Run... I think that not replacing him is the wisest decission, and I thikn they should still play those classic songs without him. Avoiding the songs where he had legendary sax parts is a false and dishonourable way of trying to avoid his absence.