1. Originally posted by KleWdSide:Ahhhh, good ole' Casino Nancy. Greasy Lake's pet. If you dare to disagree with her & call her out on her bitchy behavior, you'll get banned.

    Just like BTX, it's full of NS81s kool aid drinkers
  2. I really hope those rumours I posted earlier today are true, can you guys find it?

    Tracks 2 and a new album would be sweet.
  3. Regarding the cluttering. Isn't there a spoiler box that could be used for long lists? Because I do agree it's a bit annoying sometimes. Sorry if this has already been mentioned.
  4. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    One can easily miss a post being made in a thread that's constantly updated with news, bootlegs shared, photos, videos and all. There's little or nothing wrong in repeating, it happens constantly on the U2 news related topics and nobody accuses those who re-post of "cluttering". Re-posting one image isn't comparable with posting loads of 60-lines-long bootlegs each day - something that's very praiseworthy, but can be annoying for those trying to follow a discussion. Oh, by the way, this single's cover was posted in small size, with no concrete release date attached. So it's hardly "cluttering", more like "updating". There you go!

    PS. The page number depends on how many posts per page you choose to view; I have 20 posts per page so it's page 229 for me.

    has no one told you size doesn't matter - it's what you do with it
  5. Originally posted by Mr_Trek:Regarding the cluttering. Isn't there a spoiler box that could be used for long lists? Because I do agree it's a bit annoying sometimes. Sorry if this has already been mentioned.

    Sure, spoiler tags should be used for that too, not only for hiding "sensitive" info.
  6. Originally posted by Mr_Trek:Regarding the cluttering. Isn't there a spoiler box that could be used for long lists? Because I do agree it's a bit annoying sometimes. Sorry if this has already been mentioned.

    i wouldn't worry about it i've already said i won't be posting anymore bootsin any section which is a shame because there is still a monumental amount to go that haven't been around before
  7. This is really starting to get pathetic now
  8. I'm guessing it's a bit different than the one from the "Blood Brothers" EP?



  9. Haha. Well, I didn't mind NS81 because he was just harmlessly trolling with silly topics & people would get so worked up.

    But I really hated GL after a while because it's quite cliquish & too heavily moderated.
  10. I enjoy the long threads. Keenly searching for gems I haven't heard. Don't let the criticism deter you . This should be a place for everybody .
  11. Originally posted by andypow:I enjoy the long threads. Keenly searching for gems I haven't heard. Don't let the criticism deter you . This should be a place for everybody .

    thanks but there will be no more. I said right at the start that i didn't expect thanks and that everyone should just download and enjoy but nor do i expect what is a phenomenal amount of work on my part and others - there are more Bruce boots on here than there are u2 - to be insultingly dismissed as 'clutter' by people who clearly fail to see how much set list variations matter to those interested in bruce's live work. Let's say for example you have on the face of it a 'normal' gig no big shocks in the setlist no long lost outtakes but somewhere near the end incident goes into rosalita? The subtelties might be lost on most but on 1% of people they would hit that download button so fast they'd be in danger of breaking something. personally i have no interest in what he's releasing or what date it comes out - i'll buy it anyway. Just as i have no interest in what he writes to fans etc it is all about the concerts and the sessions - always has been always will be that's why it's taken me thirty plus years to amass one of the biggest collections in the world - there are things here not just Bruce but u2, police, bowie that you can''t begin to imagine exist. Rock n roll folks, that's all.