1. Solid show as always..a bit over 3 hrs from the 64 year old Boss . IMO he did a couple too many covers though . 6 is too much . Tom Morello was great . Had great seats on the side of the stage .

    I wish he would have played a bit more off Darkness and dropped maybe 3 of the covers .....One of the signs from the crowd said Candy's Room , he took it and left it in the pile by Max's drums . But no Candy...



    Highlights : Badlands, Boom Boom , THE RIVER , PROVE IT ALL NIGHT . Tom Joad and of course the 3 classics off Born To Run .


  2. hehehe it's the 3rd time lately, he might be thinking he's in England hehe
    good old boy


  3. plus a never-played-before outtake of the album ... Linda Let Me Be The One

    not to be underestimated Hearts of Stone and I Wanna Marry You and Save My Love
    the other day he was in River mood, yesterdays a little bit more obscure (how he likes to say) hehe

    as i said .. lucky you

  4. 1. Clampdown
    2. Badlands
    3. High Hopes
    4. No Surrender
    5. I WANNA MARRY YOU (Solo acoustic) (Request)
    6. LINDA LET ME BE THE ONE
    7. BOOM BOOM
    8. HEARTS OF STONE
    9. Talk To Me
    10. Wrecking Ball
    11. Hungry Heart
    12. Save My Love
    13. The River
    14. Prove It All Night (78)
    15. My Love Will Not Let You Down
    16. Darlington County
    17. Shackled and Drawn
    18. The Ghost of Tom Joad
    19. The Rising
    20. Land of Hope and Dreams
    ******
    21. Highway To Hell
    22. Born To Run
    23. Dancing in the Dark
    24. Tenth Avenue Freeze Out
    25. Shout
    26. The Wall
    27. Thunder Road
  5. Wow, there is some serious non casual stuff in there! Great to see him shaking things up again
  6. Bruce Springsteen > U2

    (setlist-wise, energy-wise, album-wise, everything remotely related to music-wise....)
  7. Originally posted by aski:Bruce Springsteen > U2

    (setlist-wise, energy-wise, album-wise, everything remotely related to music-wise....)

    is the wrong answer... thanks for playing, don't worry you're not going home empty handed, everyone gets a cuddly toy.

  8. Originally posted by aski:Bruce Springsteen > U2

    (setlist-wise, energy-wise, album-wise, everything remotely related to music-wise....)

    Agreed . U2 have always played it safe as far as shows . Same set gig after gig . Sure they might play a different tune here and there . Big deal . The 2005 Vertigo tour was a favorite of mine, simply because they actually mixed it up for once and played arenas . Not big over the top shows like Zoo TV , PoP and 360. Same exact sets each and every night for those Las Vegas extravaganza . The encores were different almost every night and they used 3 different openers (L&P,COBL and Vertigo)

    Bruce is 64 and is still amazing . My show last week was fantastic .

    Bruce Pearl Jam and DMB always mix up their sets . On 2 night stands in the same city , DMB will play 2 completely different sets.

    U2 , not at all .
  9. Difference is that U2's show is theatrically based whereas Springsteen, PJ, The Cure, etc. base their shows on length and variety. Two completely different shows. Yes, it is disappointing that U2 don't change up their set but seeing a show that is in your face and conceptual is a different experience.
  10. There's no band with a more static setlist than Pink Floyd, and still they're widely regarded as one of the best live acts ever. This argument has been repeated to death here and everywhere; as Kieran says they're totally different show concepts. One can love both and enjoy each in its own time. Would I love U2 to play longer, more varied setlist? Surely. Would I like if they give their show concept/theme up in return? Not so sure. Each approach has its ups and cons.