LIV
Active topics
  1. They're already playing Italy, France and Germany again? Although Italy is a different city. If they do a 3rd leg in Europe I think it would be seriously unfair to neglect Ireland and the UK
  2. Originally posted by MWSAH:[..]

    Don't care about that actually. The Arena was piss poor and ugly but if the concert is any good I'm okay with it


    hows the acoustic in eindhoven? I prefer a more open place... Malieveld?
  3. Originally posted by jofice:They're already playing Italy, France and Germany again? Although Italy is a different city. If they do a 3rd leg in Europe I think it would be seriously unfair to neglect Ireland and the UK


    +1

    Would love another concert in Scotland but not in Glasgow. Didn't go to Glasgow last time, could only afford Dublin which obviously, seemed the better decision. I'm thinking Edinburgh would be a better decision since Murrayfield is bigger than Hampden in Glasgow. Murrayfield are really tight with concerts. Only about 5 or 6 bands have played there in the last 20 years, I think.
  4. Originally posted by jofice:They're already playing Italy, France and Germany again? Although Italy is a different city. If they do a 3rd leg in Europe I think it would be seriously unfair to neglect Ireland and the UK


    Yes but France, Italy and Germany are 3 of the biggest countries of Europe...
    Holland and Ireland are small countries... If you get 2 or concerts there, you may be happy, others get only 1 or none. (even if it's your home country)
    Don't got an explanation for England though

    I'm just saying that i really think that after this leg it's all over for Europe...
    Come on, they played almost everywhere here
  5. i strongly hope that after the us leg 2011 the tour is over

    touring from 2009 to 2011 with the same stage and concept should do and is enough!

    then they should make the normal break of 4 years and come back with INDOOR shows
  6. Originally posted by krypto1983:i strongly hope that after the us leg 2011 the tour is over

    touring from 2009 to 2011 with the same stage and concept should do and is enough!

    then they should make the normal break of 4 years and come back with INDOOR shows


    +1
  8. Originally posted by krypto1983:i strongly hope that after the us leg 2011 the tour is over

    touring from 2009 to 2011 with the same stage and concept should do and is enough!

    then they should make the normal break of 4 years and come back with INDOOR shows


    Don't agree with this at all. I wouldn't mind another European leg. Also, you say "touring from 2009 to 2011 with the same stage and concept should do and is enough". It probably will be from 2009 to 2011 anyway, can't see it going into 2012.

    And a break of 4 years? 2 of them are in their 50's! They don't have much time left.
  9. Maybe they still also need to make up for the losses suffered by cancelling the American tour earlier this year


  10. Could be a reason, i'm pretty sure they lost their 'no claims bonus' from the insurance company anyway


  11. I think so too, they will need to do another tour again because they need to make more money like you already said
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.