1. Rumor about the 4th show in Sao Paulo, Brazil

    OMG!

  2. Really? THat's a bit too much I think
  3. Don't blame they...It's hard to ignore our audience


  4. More shows=setlist shakers

    Unless they just refill the setlist after the second night and basically play two different sets over 4 nights...

    4 nights is a bit much, but never in an arena...Chicago, Boston, and New York always get 4 to 5 shows on a single leg, and always at least 2 more on any following legs, since 2001 anyway. For a show of this magnitude, though, perhaps.
  5. Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:4 nights is a bit much, but never in an arena...Chicago, Boston, and New York always get 4 to 5 shows on a single leg, and always at least 2 more on any following legs, since 2001 anyway. For a show of this magnitude, though, perhaps.

    Morumbi Stadium is hardly comparable with an arena 4 shows would mean Almost 300.000 people - that is A LOT of people for a single-city residence.
  6. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
    Morumbi Stadium is hardly comparable with an arena 4 shows would mean Almost 300.000 people - that is A LOT of people for a single-city residence.


    some 11 million people live in Sao Paolo
  7. Rumors talked also about Porto Alegre and Rio, if i'm not wrong; maybe the didn't get an agreement for these cities so they add shows in Sao Paolo.
    Brazil is very very large and with much more persons than the 11 million of Sao Paolo ... rivers of fans i guess
  8. And we have almost 20 million people in the city of Sao Paulo and neighborhood cities and almost 200 million people in Brazil. I agree it would be lovely to add shows in other cities, but with 4 shows, people from all around the country will be here in SP and they would erduce theirs costs, in my opinion