REC
Active topics
  1. Use the assigned topic dudes
  2. Don't know if i replied before, but thanks for uploading


  3. It's the same quality, but Apple Lossless files are smaller.
  5. Good source for information. Should clear a lot up. I prefer Apple Lossless because that's the only lossless extension my Ipod plays.
  6. I haven't really listened to the album yet so I was quite pleased to hear Magnificent. This could be a real grower for me and looking forward to future live performances of it.
  7. U2torrents got a new one up, said is that the sound is better. I will take a look.
  8. Originally posted by dieder:Good source for information. Should clear a lot up. I prefer Apple Lossless because that's the only lossless extension my Ipod plays.


  9. Originally posted by dieder:Good source for information. Should clear a lot up. I prefer Apple Lossless because that's the only lossless extension my Ipod plays.


    IPod plays WAV aswell. . .


  12. yea. Annoyingly though I don't think it lets you add artwork (certainly didn't when I last tried it). It's a technically better format than apple lossless because it's one less conversion step. I have no problem trading that extra conversion though if it means I can have coverflow on the touch.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.