1. its a combo of edge and larry. i watched interviews of both and can depict how they would sound singing
  2. where did u guys get a copy of the song?


  3. That could be a reason.

    I've listened to the song on numerous times now and it's quite a decent little track, if not much to it. I'd prefer if they left it as is - any longer and it loses the effect of a nice intro. After all, how long should an intro be - two minutes, three minutes, ten minutes? It should be as short as possible.

    Coldplay's Life In Technicolour (the original version) is a good example of keeping it short.
  4. Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]

    That could be a reason.

    I've listened to the song on numerous times now and it's quite a decent little track, if not much to it. I'd prefer if they left it as is - any longer and it loses the effect of a nice intro. After all, how long should an intro be - two minutes, three minutes, ten minutes? It should be as short as possible.

    Coldplay's Life In Technicolour (the original version) is a good example of keeping it short.


    Totally agree, LiT II is not bad either but I much prefer the first version.
  5. It lost its appeal and the idea of an opener when it had those vocals added. 1984 didn't have vocals added, hence why it's such a good opener.

    Kingdom hasn't been published under Gavin Friday, Eno, Daniel Lanois or any member of U2 yet on any databases...that's how we'll know when it's good a good chance of being released. There was Kingdom Come but that's the Unforgettable Fire song isn't it?


  6. lmfao

    You are a funny motherfucker Drew.


  7. I don't know where I was funny, but by God now i picture Blessed and John Rhys-Davies singing 'Kingdom' everytime i hear it.

    No minor accomplishment.