Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
The Come Together cover isn't bad but it just lacks something. Not sure what but I find a lot of the 80s stuff just seems bare.
That Hits and B-sides is probably the one I'll go for and too much is never enough. From what I saw of it (and this was the onlly one I liked the looked of) it seems worth it. Not so much creepy I don't think but more so sexually thoughtful.
I hate edits 'cos usually they're not that needed. Only too often I've found a great compilation album and half the songs are edits, missing out the solos or the best lyrics. The Madonna album was by far the worst - who edits a song called Four Minutes that actually goes for that length, down to just over three?
The only compilation albums I've found worth honestly getting are the Essential ones so if you have a band you're interested in go for those (though they're only for Sony and Legacy artists). They usually have 30-40 songs on them, maybe 50 if you get the 3.0 release and usually pretty cheap too. You can get unreleased songs, B-sides, live tracks and even remixes.
Yes, long best of/ greatest hits albums are great. The Platinum Collection by Bowie is better than Best Of Bowie or Changesbowie. The other Prince greatest hits collections, The Very Best Of Prince and Ultimate Prince are poorly selected and confusing.
Edits are often in there because it won't fit otherwise.
I've got a a Essential series compilation, (The Essential Clash). I have seen a Michael Jackson Essential compilation for $10 at JB, is it worth getting?