Originally posted by thunderbolt:Well, I've got the feeling the "free publicity" line is sort of an excuse. I mean, put U2 in your channel and there'll be lots of viewers (as the You Tube transmission proved). So they were not giving merely publicity, they were getting a higher audience indeed. I think BBC has measured the real impact of these things (they also complain about the "too much attention" on Coldplay) and go like "ooooooooooooooooooh, I should have Bono paying this s**t and get some millions out of it". And since they know they won't get a penny now, call their employees not to do it again.
Originally posted by Risto:[..]
Problem is that its not a commercial broadcast company. Its paid by taxes and then they should stay clear of too many commercial things.
Sure its great that we get to see it. But many of us dont pay UK taxes. And many UK tax payers are not interested in U2, so its unfair to them.
Originally posted by Hans23:I don't really think it was that bad, as someone living in the UK i really hardly noticed it in comparison to some of the crap they promote nowadays. anyway, as you said, fat lot of good it did them anyway
EDIT: English version here
Originally posted by Risto:[..]
Problem is that its not a commercial broadcast company. Its paid by taxes and then they should stay clear of too many commercial things.
Sure its great that we get to see it. But many of us dont pay UK taxes. And many UK tax payers are not interested in U2, so its unfair to them.