BLU
Active topics
  1. Originally posted by Mr_Trek:Yeah, they must realize they'd lose an all out war. They would probably be able to inflict some serious damage though.

    Many countries in the world can do so. Drop a nuke on a metropol, this can be done by a dozen countries or so.
  2. Originally posted by Risto:[..]

    Many countries in the world can do so. Drop a nuke on a metropol, this can be done by a dozen countries or so.

    Yeah, that's why the world doesn't need more nukes, but less. I think most countries are wiser than that now though.
  3. Well that is idealistic. We all know that even if USA, France, Russia, Israel, Pakistan, etc swear that they dismantle all missiles that all we know is that we have to take their word for it. For that reason other countries would want to have a few behind their hands, and so nobody will completely dismantle their arsenal.
  4. In other news, Greece will publish new metrics about the economy this week. Experts are afraid that it will be worse than expected.

    So in the end we will have pumped a needles amount of tax money into a hopeless situation. In the mean time we have increased Greece's debt, lowered the chance of getting the money back to 0 and last but not least our own debt by lending money to lend Greece money. Thank god for the overpaid 'experts' at the EU.
  5. Originally posted by stj0691:[..]

    You'll love this bit about Obamacare then. In order for a state to opt out of this, they [the state] have to provide a plan that has the same coverage and the same cost. I would imagine having to force a state to have to adopt a federal plan of some sort could only be avoiding by calling it a tax. Somebody please tell me I'm wrong though, because if the Supreme Court missed this, it's a huge miss.

    By the way which part of my post are you referring to?


    The law in your state is a state level law.
  6. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    You know something, Aaron? You're as boring with your you-commies-will-burn-in-hell shit as Yogi with his anti-yankee/NATO propaganda, but he at least participates in other sections of our website and our forums. You just come over and over to the Politics thread, only to fight people and spread your speeech. This is a U2 website with some off-topic things like this thread, but U2start is not a political forum. If you want a dedicated politics forum, register over at US Message Board, or maybe take a look around Political Forum (worldwide forum, not only US-related) and Debate Politics; I really think those are the websites you're actually looking for.

    I have *nothing* against right-wingers who reasonably argument their positions; my best friend leans very much towards right wing, and we're best friends since 21 years ago. It's just an example tos how you that I respect opinions, whether I share them or not, and I don't have anything personal against those who don't share my opinions (something you can't afford to say, by the way). But man, I *do* have something against those who just repeat their arguments over and over, and automatically dismiss and/or insult anyone who opposes them with true thoughts and arguments.

    I'm done with you, seriously. But lemme tell ya: one more "piss off", "fuck off", "you suck", "I don't give a damn about you" or any of other equivalent bullshit towards any of our truly appreciated and useful members, and you will be the one who's done with U2start.


    Did I explain myself clearly enough?


    Just ban me and get it over with. I'm tired of being held to a double standard, and all you threats, and passive agressive B.S. Either follow though on one of your threats, or stop doing them. Your a pety imature man, and how you ever got admin privilages is beyond me.

    Since I know this will get me banned, goodbye to everyone on this site who actually cares for me.
  8. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]


    Just ban me and get it over with. I'm tired of being held to a double standard, and all you threats, and passive agressive B.S. Either follow though on one of your threats, or stop doing them. Your a pety imature man, and how you ever got admin privilages is beyond me.

    Since I know this will get me banned, goodbye to everyone on this site who actually cares for me.

    You didn't actually read my post, did you?
  9. I did. It was quite hostile. You do realize if you ban me you cant mock me for my reluctance to go to college on the govs dime.
  10. In my humble opinion, an argumented, long-thought post is quite less hostile than a constant stream of piss off's (and similar dismissings).


    Ok, you might have read it, but you clearly didn't understand it.
  11. Hey, don't start a war now Sergio or Aaron It's "only" politics and I don't think people need to be banned for political views.
  12. Originally posted by LikeASong:In my humble opinion, an argumented, long-thought post is quite less hostile than a constant stream of piss off's (and similar dismissings).


    Ok, you might have read it, but you clearly didn't understand it.

    I did. When are we going to quit these passive agressive games?
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.