1. This is getting very repetitive: "You mean aside" is beginning to get boring now.

    Okay, so one man breaks the law and suddenly you're all in arms about it? How do you even know that he actually broke the law? What's your proof? Is It could have been a joke, he could have been hacked by a republican? He would've been immediately arrested if authorities found that out. And because Gary Jackson was brainwashing the gullible twats, people will have been plugging those numbers begging for him to be jailed.

    Also, I said an 'unbiased' source not 'biased', remember.
  2. Originally posted by fabian:[..]

    That is an assumption you cannot prove.

    But as I said, there is no point in this discussion because of the 10 million gap.

    Means all the diff in a tight race.
  3. Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]

    This is getting very repetitive: "You mean aside" is beginning to get boring now.

    Okay, so one man breaks the law and suddenly you're all in arms about it? How do you even know that he actually broke the law? What's your proof? Is It could have been a joke, he could have been hacked by a republican? He would've been immediately arrested if authorities found that out. And because Gary Jackson was brainwashing the gullible twats, people will have been plugging those numbers begging for him to be jailed.

    Also, I said an 'unbiased' source not 'biased', remember.

    Unbiased of course meaning liberal.
  4. Originally posted by fabian:[..]

    I guess the VVD will shrink next elections to twenty seats. Either CDA or PvdA will be the biggest party, unless Wilders will get the VVD votes.


    Don't think so, I hope people will see that with the election results this was the only option. I voted VVD myself and I can't stand those left creeps of PvdA but this is probably the best for the country right now.


  5. In my experience how biased anyone considers something is based on how much they agree with it.

  6. Okay, fine. Insufficient evidence. Case closed.
  7. How often have you accused a source you agreed with of being biased?
  8. Originally posted by bartajax:[..]


    Don't think so, I hope people will see that with the election results this was the only option. I voted VVD myself and I can't stand those left creeps of PvdA but this is probably the best for the country right now.

    I agree, it was the only option. I do not oppose against Rutte-Verhagen or Rutte-Asscher.

    As a current student, I will keep my 'stufi' and I won't get a 'long studying bill'. In fact, if the amount of students decreases, my salary may increase later on. Moreover, none of my tax will go to students later on.

    Then the 'zorgpremie': as I am not making more than 20.000 euros a year, I will only have to pay 255 euros. I do understand why the rich VVD voters do oppose against the bill.

    Finally, I believe the 'hypotheekrenteaftrek' will stay the same if you do not make more than 70.000 a year and even then you will only pay half of a percent more. No problem.

    It is a good thing the government spends less money. It makes sure I will get my AOW later om.

  9. This raises a question: do you consider anything in that source as biased?

    And yes, I notice some flaws in some sources I agree with. If you actually read it and consider the evidence then you might notice flaws. You can still agree with it, though.
  10. We agree for once.
  11. The US needs less biased news. It does so badly. Here is where public service can play a important role, like it does in Sweden. Not saying it's a complete guarantee, but for example today's show about the US election felt pretty damn unbiased. Letting both sides speak, the host and the show itself not casting judgement. Maybe it could've been a hit in the US.