Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]
I think Mitt Romney would've won if he'd been more liberal on social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion.
This was note a social issue election.
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]
I think Mitt Romney would've won if he'd been more liberal on social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion.
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
He was too hush hush about details on all of his plans and in that he seemed dishonest and untrustworthy. That plus what you said I think is why he didn't win. Doesn't help that his running mate was a radical weirdo who got DUMMIED by Biden in their debate.
Originally posted by ahn1991:Mitt would have won if he had not tried so hard to tank his chances all throughout his campaign.
Also, Obama now has a term free from the pressures of re-election. Time to get stuff done and watch the tears stream down the GOP(arty of No)'s faces.
Originally posted by ahn1991:Are you a US citizen?
If so, he is your president whether you like it or not.
And speaking of special interest groups, exit polls suggest that Romney has no interest in women or Latinos (expanding to all immigrant groups is not out of the question) or people under the age of 45.
And he has no interest in 47% of the American people.
Originally posted by fabian:I believe we haven't discussed yet how Romney split the American people up into two groups, one being 'victims he doesn't have to care for'.
And once you've justified the unjustifiable, please tell us how bipartisanship would go between president Romney and the forty-percent.
Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]
The left have created a party platform where it is in there best intrest to keep people poor.