U2start.com | Generic News and Politics Topic

They claimed that every elderly wears 'Dont kill me' bands here in Holland xD So I am not inclined to believe a similar story.

Not every bureaucrat is a sadist Aaron.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121128006-nationalize-retirement.html

Oh snap.

KieranU2

12 years

That's what you believe. It's you that is completely gullible when it comes to something that is obviously questionable. It comes from a professor who said this about five months ago. 130,000? Really?

It's just the Daily Mail trying to get a story to shock people but really, it's ancient and incorrect. He's estimating it purely from the city of Liverpool - it's a load of bullshit I'm afraid.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

Me gullible? I question whether or not I'm alive, until I hit my hand on something.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

http://nilrr.org/2012/11/30/michigan-union-bosses-would-have-a-good-point-if-americans-werent-free-to-move-from-state-to-state/

Good ole union fear-mongering. Its the only way they can beat RTW, since they can never fight it on the virtues.

Yogi

12 years

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/30/israel-build-jewish-settlement-un-palestine

"The Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has ordered the construction of thousands of new homes in Jewish settlements in the occupied territories in what will be widely interpreted as retaliation for the United Nations vote to recognise a Palestinian state on Thursday."

They're insane.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

Insanity is a matter of perspective, son.

Ross1441

12 years

Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:http://nilrr.org/2012/11/30/michigan-union-bosses-would-have-a-good-point-if-americans-werent-free-to-move-from-state-to-state/

Good ole union fear-mongering. Its the only way they can beat RTW, since they can never fight it on the virtues.

I would also just like to make clear that the site from which your article originated clearly states that they're bias. Therefore you can't state them as a source for anything.

Their official statement on what they do: Anti-union organization which does research and provides analysis to "expose the inequities of compulsory unionism."

The whole idea of research is to find facts. Not to prove your own beliefs. What a stupid organisation.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

Originally posted by Ross1441:[..]

I would also just like to make clear that the site from which your article originated clearly states that they're bias. Therefore you can't state them as a source for anything.

Their official statement on what they do: Anti-union organization which does research and provides analysis to "expose the inequities of compulsory unionism."

The whole idea of research is to find facts. Not to prove your own beliefs. What a stupid organisation.

Everyone has a bias. They just have the balls to admit it. As long as you recognize it there is nothing to worry about.

I stand by my statement. Unions cant argue with right to work on the merits, so they turn to fear-mongering.

Ross1441

12 years

Granted, they have the balls to admit it, but it does render any "research" they do completely irrelevant by default.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

Originally posted by Ross1441:Granted, they have the balls to admit it, but it does render any "research" they do completely irrelevant by default.

There is no such thing as an unbiased source. Therefore, I guess all sources are irrelevant.

Ross1441

12 years

Well not exactly. Many organisations do make an effort to be unbiased in their research. It's what makes certain research bodies "reputable". It can never be perfect but steps can be taken to make your research more legitimate. Your linked site is a far cry from that. They explicitly say that they're out to prove their own point of view. They therefore cannot be quoted as a source. This is fact.

Generic News and Politics Topic

what they said

did you know

you

forums

U2start