BLU

Generic News and Politics Topic

 Active topics

Topic started 14 years ago by vanquish in Your Blue Room. Since then 4,649 posts have been made by 75 users.

wtshnnfb01

12 years

Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]

Well, let's say most of the muslim nations join the war, and most of us Western nations. That's almost a WWIII.

Not really. Most of Europe has no reason at all to get involved, and I cant see Russia doing anything other than supplying arms and advisers.
Mr_Trek

12 years

Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

Not really. Most of Europe has no reason at all to get involved, and I cant see Russia doing anything other than supplying arms and advisers.

Well, a lot of European nations are in the NATO.

All I'm saying is that the Syria situation is taking "complex" to a new level and I don't think it's possible for a decisionmaker to understand at all.
wtshnnfb01

12 years

Most the countries in NATO, don't really do that much.
Yogi

12 years

Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:World War 3, is pretty unlikely. A major regional conflict is much more likely.

Um. USA/Britain/France attacks Syria. Russia and China doesn't like it. Syria and Iran attacks Israel.

And then you have USA/Britain/France on one side and China/Russia/Iran on the other. That's global conflict and it is a bad one. C'mon Obama, show that you're worth of your Nobel peace prize and start WWIII.
LikeASong

12 years

Yeah, that scenario is quite scary, and worst of it, quite probable.
germcevoy

12 years

Watching the House of Commons. It's basically a dock measuring contest to see who can deliver the most poetic argument.
fabian

12 years

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan
wtshnnfb01

12 years

Originally posted by fabian:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

What does that have to do with anything?
fabian

12 years

I was pointing out that there has been a Arabic war with UN Security Council members on both sides before.
Yogi

12 years

http://rt.com/news/uk-parliament-vote-syria-181/

UK government motion on Syria intervention has been rejected by a 285 to 272 margin after British lawmakers rejected an opposition Labour amendment calling for more information about the deployment of chemical weapons in Syria.

Good!
Risto

12 years

+1
iTim

12 years

Originally posted by germcevoy:Watching the House of Commons. It's basically a dock measuring contest to see who can deliver the most poetic argument.

Always a laugh.

Generic News and Politics Topic

what they said

did you know

you

forums

U2start