1. Let the Arabic League take initiative then. Besides its a civil war, we cant please everyone there. We will just make it worse.

  2. Because Libyja. Perfectly healthy country was torn apart and is now in hands of Al'Qaeda and in the middle of tribe war. Western democracy my ass.
  3. Originally posted by Yogi:[..]

    Because Libyja. Perfectly healthy country was torn apart and is now in hands of Al'Qaeda and in the middle of tribe war. Western democracy my ass.

    It wasn't torn apart because of the intervention, was it?
  4. Arguably it was.
  5. I call bs. Both Libya and Syria are countries that already were torn apart. So far, over 100,000 people died in Syria. I posted that BBC link about an hour ago, here is it again: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-23892594. Innocent people are hurt in a repulsive way. It's our task to help them.
  6. Well I am not sure which of the two parties to help. Devil's job. I am not sure that the majority of the population is pro-rebel.
  7. Originally posted by Risto:Well I am not sure which of the two parties to help. Devil's job. I am not sure that the majority of the population is pro-rebel.

    That's the only reason why there hasn't been an intervention yet. Meanwhile, people are killed because of these politics.
  8. Well if you bomb the government you are helping Al-Qaeda and if you bomb Al-Qaeda you help Assad.

    The only intervention possible is station 1 mln soldiers there to protect a possible cease-fire. But we all know what happens when we pull those back...
  9. Besides, we (the global community) didnt intervein in the US civil war either. We cant solve their problems if they dont want them to be solved.
  10. I like to think we are more civilized now than we were in 1861.
  11. It has nothing to do with civilised. We can go to war, force them to stop. But that doesnt remove the hatred between the fractions.
  12. So, you are going to allow these crimes against humanity?