BLU
Active topics
  1. Originally posted by Yogi:[..]

    You mean like 110.000 dead civilians in Iraq killed by USA? Wake up man, not everything that comes from the West is good and not everything that comes from the East is evil.

    Yes, Libya was perfectly good place to live before West decided to back up rebels which were mostly members of Al'Qaeda. They had no debt towards other countries and banks while Western countries and corporations owed them A LOT. Do I need to mention that that debt was gone after 'revolution'?

    Oh yeah, then there's also something called OIL.


    You do realize, most civilian casualties in Iraq, where caused by insurgents.

    Your hatred of the U.S. has blinded you, son.

    If you want to insult my country, that is fine. Hell, I might even join you these days, but get your facts staright first.
  2. Originally posted by Risto:If we attack and Iran does what they say they would, we would end up in a huge war. With Iran, Israel, Syria involved. Which may wake sleeping tension in Egypt, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan.


    Might as well just nuke the middle east now, and get it over with. Save some time, and money.
  3. Originally posted by LikeASong:Iran has already said that if west attacks Lybia, they will be attacking Israel.
    DOn't ask me for the logics behing their reasoning (if there's any), but that is scary. Scary as fuck.


    Like you don't want Israel wiped off the map.
  5. Originally posted by Risto:Can a Nobel Peace price be revoked? If they continue, my guess there will be an preemptive invasion in Iran as well. Shit will hit the fan...


    It should be revoked.
  6. The west (Holland included) is just extremely biased, nobody cared when Israel used phosphor bombs.
  7. That's because the majority of countries use them.
  8. Israel used them in residential areas. Then its just as bad as a chemical attack.
  9. Anyway its just an example, Israel does plenty of stuff any other country wouldnt get away with.
  10. Other countries have to. FYI, despite being a chemical based weapon, its effects are incendiary in nature. The majority of countries in WW2 used roughly the same types of bombs, on bombing missions. There was actually one bombing mission against Tokyo, which arguably killed more people than one of the nukes, since the way Japanese city's where constructed at the time made them very likely to burn. Hardly the only case though. Pretty much every country that carried out bombing missions in WW2, used some form of incendiary bombs at some time or another.
  11. I am not talking about WW2, even nukes were used. And napalm has been used later as well. If we accept everything what happened during WW2 we will have one hell of a time coming up xD
  12. In other news, I think I'm gonna move to North Carolina when I'm done with college, since it has the single lowest percentage of union thugs, of any state.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.