Originally posted by Macphistfly:Aaron's got a point, though he makes it too dogmatically for my tastes.
Libya is about private interest.
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:That's the hypocrisy that capitalism leads too... I still prefer some people being saved regardless of why instead of nobody being saved though. I think human life is worth more than politics.
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:That's the hypocrisy that capitalism leads too... I still prefer some people being saved regardless of why instead of nobody being saved though. I think human life is worth more than politics.
Originally posted by Macphistfly:[..]
If it was George Bush invading, you know you'd be saying just the opposite.
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]
George Bush invaded without UN support or anything, and in an entirely different manner. I don't know the story, since I was too young, but I don't think he had the support of a large number of Iraq's population either?
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
I do think it too. It's like the people who say "Famous people do false charity, they help each other just to show off"... And I go like "Yes, but they AT LEAST do something"!! This is similar, Lybia war might be mainly regarding economic and political matters, but AT LEAST they're keeping a cruent dictator from killing his own people.
Originally posted by Macphistfly:[..]
It's still foreign interventionism in disrespect of the Constitution. "Shall not go to war without the approval of the congress."
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]
Oh, sorry. I'm not talking about whether or not it was against the constitution. I'm sure it was. I really don't care since it would've happened with or without the U.S. I'm talking about whether it's justified or not.
Originally posted by Macphistfly:That's not fair either, Sergio.
Look how many dictators us in the west have propped up to serve our own interests only for them to turn genocidal.
Originally posted by Macphistfly:In my opinion there hasn't really been a justifiable war since 1939.