BLU
Active topics


  1. So insuring your car is in some way less worse than insuring yourself so that you can get medical care when you need to?

    If there was no obamacare, would you be insured? Can you pay the ambulance, the first aid personel and a surgeon when you get a heart attack on the city streets? Or should we add those costs + interest to a debt you will be fighting for years to get rid of?

    People take the stupidists insurances, but health care aint one of them.
  2. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

    The laws of other countrys don't mean much when it comes to American domestic policy.

    Also, most states require your car to be insured, but you don't need a car to live.


    I didn't mean that because we have it, you should have it too. I meant to say that we have such laws, and we are happy with them, could be the same for you.
  3. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:That the American government has the authority to regulate commerce. Forcing it in a diffrent thing.

    Theres also other issues, but thats the big one.

    Ah fair enough if you didn't feel ObamaCare was unconstitutional, would you be against it? I'm just asking as someone who lives in a nation-state where we have the NHS, and personally can't imagine, nor would want a situation where we didn't have it.
  4. Originally posted by Risto:[..]

    So insuring your car is in some way less worse than insuring yourself so that you can get medical care when you need to?

    If there was no obamacare, would you be insured? Can you pay the ambulance, the first aid personel and a surgeon when you get a heart attack on the city streets? Or should we add those costs + interest to a debt you will be fighting for years to get rid of?

    People take the stupidists insurances, but health care aint one of them.


    I don't drive. Also, the car thing, is a state level law. The American federael govenrment wasen't meant to have that kind of power. 10th Amendment.
  5. Originally posted by Ali709:[..]

    I didn't mean that because we have it, you should have it too. I meant to say that we have such laws, and we are happy with them, could be the same for you.


    Nah. I'll stick with my individual rights, and limited government.
  6. Originally posted by WojBhoy:[..]
    Ah fair enough if you didn't feel ObamaCare was unconstitutional, would you be against it? I'm just asking as someone who lives in a nation-state where we have the NHS, and personally can't imagine, nor would want a situation where we didn't have it.


    Depends. If all they wanted to do was regulate, I'd have no problemns.


  8. I'm not a big fan of Obama, actually i'm not a fan at all, but publishing state security information is against United States interests. I'd have no problem watching this guy fry
  9. America ≠ United States of America


  10. fixed. As a matter of speaking however there is no other country in the Americas (that i'm aware of anyways) which has America as part of their country name. Thus i feel America is a justifiable way to refer to the United States in short
  11. It wasn't aimed only/directly/mostly at you. It's just the bad habit of confusing a continent with a single country.


  12. No problem. I know it's not technically correct it's just an old habit which is difficult to break
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.