2011-06-24 - Glastonbury
Tour: Various Dates
Songs played: 20
Audio recordings: 1
Videos: 1
  1. I have found many uploads (thanks to all the uploaders!!!!) including the performance in 3 HD parts (720p).

    Like many other fans I'm still wondering:

    Is there no complete DVD from the HD source (with chapters + menue) and the interview as a bonus?

    Thanks for any hint where to find that!

  2. Originally posted by Biggs31:I think there are four factors to a legendary Glasto performance:

    1) The artist must be the biggest, or one of the biggest acts, in Britain at the time of the performance.
    2) They must be at their peak.
    3) They must be able to sustain a good live show for two hours.
    4) They must be able to deal with the small stage being so far away from a huge crowd.

    It's a tall order, which is why only a few performances from the Pyramid Stage are really remembered. The obvious example is Radiohead in 1997. They had just released OK Computer. The British public had grown tired of Britpop and everyone loved Radiohead's stripped-down approach which focussed on the songs.

    In recent years there has been a trend of 'marquee' acts, i.e. Paul McCartney, and 'novelty' acts who are different for Glastonbury, i.e. Jay-Z, or indie darlings, i.e. The Killers, Arcade Fire, who can't sustain a full set to that size of crowd.

    U2 are definitely a marquee act and have passed their peak. There was no way they could produce an all-time classic performance. But they hardly put a foot wrong.


    Very well said. You named some of the legendary performances I mentioned before. Good example, Radiohead '97 was legendary (and probably the most remembered Glasto performance ever), and it was that legendary exactly because of that 4 factors you wrote.

    The other day, U2 mostly lacked factors 1 and 2 (because 4 wasnt that much of a problem and 3 obviously isn't a concern for U2). They could have gone over factor 1 if NLOTH had been more of a success, but they can't go over the fact that they're not at their peak anymore.
  3. I struggle with torrents, I know it's a big ask but if somebody could upload the HD source on fileserve or any of the hosts this site uses I could author a dvd version with menus and extras, it wouldn't be HD but would be a quality standard definition DVD and an improvement on my recording
  4. Can you imagine of what a jet lag they must have had from this long trip to the UK, must have been very tired. Amazing what a performance theyve pulled out despite of this, so cool. If someone wants or not, you need to have deep respect for this.
  5. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    Very well said. You named some of the legendary performances I mentioned before. Good example, Radiohead '97 was legendary (and probably the most remembered Glasto performance ever), and it was that legendary exactly because of that 4 factors you wrote.

    The other day, U2 mostly lacked factors 1 and 2 (because 4 wasnt that much of a problem and 3 obviously isn't a concern for U2). They could have gone over factor 1 if NLOTH had been more of a success, but they can't go over the fact that they're not at their peak anymore.


    Agreed. Any criticisms on that basis are out of their hands.




    I agree they're a great festival band but I don't think they have the songs to headline the biggest festival in the world. As it turns out, they headlined Reading not Glastonbury. I got mixed up!
  6. Originally posted by Biggs31:Agreed. Any criticisms on that basis are out of their hands.
    [..]
    I agree they're a great festival band but I don't think they have the songs to headline the biggest festival in the world. As it turns out, they headlined Reading not Glastonbury. I got mixed up!

    I agree about your Arcade Fire and Killers criticism (not that much of a critic but anyway, we get each other)...

    I'm a BIG The Killers fan (I myself uploaded 6 or 7 Killers bootlegs some weeks ago, including their 2007-06-23 - Glastonbury show), but I agree that they lack the impressive backup collection that headlining this festival requires. Sure they have some songs that were true landmarks of the decade like Mr. Brightside, When You Were Young, Human or Somebody Told Me... But nowhere near the trascendental hymns that U2, Radiohead, Muse, Bruce Springsteen or even Coldplay have pulled out throughout their widespan career.

    Arcade Fire has a similar problem, they have an extensive catalogue but they only became very very popular -to the mainstream public at least- with their 2007 album Neon Bible, and they have only 3 albums out... I can't deny they might be an excellent excellent band (they're high up on my to-attend bands list), but my uncles's group are also excellent musicians and performers, and they can't headline Glastonbury or Reading... Ya know wh'ta mean? (And no, I'm not comparing the almighty Arcade Fire with my uncle's band)
  7. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
    I agree about your Arcade Fire and Killers criticism (not that much of a critic but anyway, we get each other)...

    I'm a BIG The Killers fan (I myself uploaded 6 or 7 Killers bootlegs some weeks ago, including their 2007-06-23 - Glastonbury show), but I agree that they lack the impressive backup collection that headlining this festival requires. Sure they have some songs that were true landmarks of the decade like Mr. Brightside, When You Were Young, Human or Somebody Told Me... But nowhere near the trascendental hymns that U2, Radiohead, Muse, Bruce Springsteen or even Coldplay have pulled out throughout their widespan career.

    Arcade Fire has a similar problem, they have an extensive catalogue but they only became very very popular -to the mainstream public at least- with their 2007 album Neon Bible, and they have only 3 albums out... I can't deny they might be an excellent excellent band (they're high up on my to-attend bands list), but my uncles's group are also excellent musicians and performers, and they can't headline Glastonbury or Reading... Ya know wh'ta mean? (And no, I'm not comparing the almighty Arcade Fire with my uncle's band)


    Yeah, I can agree with that. AF is my TOP 5 band, this year they have the best album in the world, undenyable, and with another great album (all of their albums are true master pieces, but not for mainstream public) they will be able to headline Glastonbury. As much as I love Coldplay for example, they have no chance against AF, both musically and lyrically.
  8. Originally posted by Yogi:Yeah, I can agree with that. AF is my TOP 5 band, this year they have the best album in the world, undenyable, and with another great album (all of their albums are true master pieces, but not for mainstream public) they will be able to headline Glastonbury. As much as I love Coldplay for example, they have no chance against AF, both musically and lyrically.

    While being immensely good musicians (and funny to watch), Arcade Fire will never be as popular as Coldplay, because their music is so complex and so hard to get into that mainstream tends to ignore them. They might reach to the point of headlining Glasto or do 80.000 people stadiums very soon, but you won't find anyone humming an Arcade Fire tune while walking on the street... They won't reach that level of popularity.
    Clocks and Viva La Vida might be worse songs than the 85% of AF's catalogue, but you can ask 1000 random people on a crowded street and I bet that 995 of them know the lyrics or at least can hum along to the melody. AF will never reach that level...... And I don't think they need to, on the other hand



    [./extremely off topic]
  9. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]


    I'm a BIG The Killers fan (I myself uploaded 6 or 7 Killers bootlegs some weeks ago, including their 2007-06-23 - Glastonbury show), but I agree that they lack the impressive backup collection that headlining this festival requires. Sure they have some songs that were true landmarks of the decade like Mr. Brightside, When You Were Young, Human or Somebody Told Me... But nowhere near the trascendental hymns that U2, Radiohead, Muse, Bruce Springsteen or even Coldplay have pulled out throughout their widespan career.




    I feel The Killers would have been better off headlining as part of the Day & Age tour rather than the Sam's Town tour primarily for this reason, 2 albums just didn't seem like enough to get a place as a headliner and it had only been 3 years before they had released their first album.